

Lively v. Baldoni 22 - The Great Subpoena Mystery SOLVED. - with MJ Morley
Jun 5, 2025
MJ Morley, a savvy New York lawyer, brings intriguing legal insights about the Blake Lively case. He unpacks the complexities of a mysterious subpoena, revealing new findings no one else has noticed. The conversation dives into the identity challenges surrounding the entity Van Zand and assesses the legitimacy of a New York lawsuit. Morley also discusses the legal maneuvers in celebrity cases, highlighting the ethical dilemmas posed by media narratives and the public's misunderstandings of legal processes. A captivating peek into the legal underbelly of high-profile drama!
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Subpoena Confirmed as Key Evidence
- There was indeed a subpoena involved that provided crucial evidence for Blake Lively's complaints.
- Denying the subpoena's existence or the honesty of lawyers involved is a flawed assumption by some online commentators.
Misconceptions About Van Zandt Corp
- The plaintiff entity, Van Zandt, is a New York corporation, not Delaware or California as some speculated.
- Misidentification arose from public registry errors linking it incorrectly to another defunct Delaware entity.
John Doe Strategy Explained
- Naming John Doe defendants enables filing lawsuits without knowing exact responsible parties.
- This tactic facilitates obtaining subpoenas to uncover identities without early public exposure.