Today, Explained Between a Stone and a hard place
Feb 13, 2020
Andrew Prokop, Vox’s senior political correspondent, dives into the chaos surrounding Roger Stone's sentencing and its ripple effects on the Department of Justice. He discusses the political intrigues stemming from the 2016 election, exposing legal troubles and the attempts to mislead investigations. Prokop highlights public dissent over the sentencing process, resignations of federal prosecutors, and growing concerns about the politicization of justice. The conversation reflects on trust in the legal system amid political pressures, all while celebrating a milestone moment in podcasting.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Roger Stone's Deception
- Roger Stone, a Trump advisor, tried to contact WikiLeaks for Clinton info during the 2016 campaign.
- He then lied to Congress, leading to an obstruction investigation.
DOJ Interference and Prosecutor Resignations
- Prosecutors recommended 7-9 years for Stone, which Trump called a "miscarriage of justice".
- The DOJ then reduced the recommendation, causing prosecutors to quit in protest.
Trump's Interference Concerns
- Trump's attacks on the judge and the DOJ raise concerns about politicization of justice.
- Arguments for leniency include Stone's health and lack of prior convictions.