Felony or witch hunt: Who told the best story at Trump’s trial?
May 23, 2024
auto_awesome
New York correspondent for The Times, Will Pavia, discusses the 'hush money' trial involving Donald Trump. The podcast debates who presented the best story in the trial, highlighting the dynamics of witness testimony, prosecution versus defense strategies, and the anticipation of key witness testimonies. The episode delves into the testimonies of Michael Cohen and Robert Costello, analyzing the trial's complexities and predicting possible outcomes.
Witness testimonies like Stormy Daniels' vivid account play a crucial role in the trial's narrative.
Michael Cohen's credibility is challenged by the defense through cross-examination, focusing on inconsistencies and past lies.
Deep dives
Witness Testimonies in Trump's Trial
The podcast episode provides a detailed account of witness testimonies in the trial related to Donald Trump and his alleged hush money payments. Stormy Daniels, a key witness, vividly described her encounter with Trump in a hotel suite. She mentioned intimate details of their conversation and interactions. The defense tried to discredit her testimony, but the prosecution found her compelling and potentially convincing to the jury. Michael Cohen, another crucial witness, testified about his involvement in making payments and his relationship with Trump.
Challenges During Witness Testimonies
During Michael Cohen's testimony, the defense engaged in intense cross-examination to challenge his credibility. Cohen faced questions about his past lies, including lying to Congress and his motivations. The defense highlighted inconsistencies in his statements and actions, aiming to cast doubt on his reliability as a witness.
Defense Strategy and Witness Testimonies
The defense's strategy focused on discrediting key witnesses like Cohen and emphasizing that there was no illegal activity in attempts to influence the election. They called Robert Costello to testify, who had mixed implications for the defense as his demeanor and statements created ambiguity during the trial. The defense rested its case quickly, refraining from calling additional witnesses like Trump himself.
Closing Arguments and Verdict Expectations
As the trial nears its conclusion, both the prosecution and defense are preparing for closing arguments. After the closing statements, the jury will deliberate to reach a verdict. The intricate legal theories and varying interpretations of intent in the alleged crimes may prolong the jury's decision-making process, possibly leading to a mistrial if not all jurors are in agreement. The unpredictability of the outcome leaves room for speculation, with each side having presented compelling arguments.
Donald Trump’s 'hush money' trial is in its final stages as the prosecution and defence teams have both now rested their cases. The jury will return on Tuesday for closing arguments - and maybe even a verdict. This is ultimately a trial of two competing stories. So who told theirs best?
This podcast was brought to you thanks to the support of readers of The Times and The Sunday Times. Subscribe today: http://thetimes.co.uk/thestory
Guest: Will Pavia, New York correspondent for The Times
Host: Luke Jones.
Clips: ABC News, WPRI, Forbes, Jimmy Kimmel Live, Michael Cohen's TikTok.