How States, Feds, and Countries Are Approaching 'Online Safety
Oct 20, 2023
auto_awesome
Matthew Feeney and Jennifer Huddleston discuss the approaches taken by governments to online safety, including the UK's new online safety bill, the global impact of Europe's regulations, state approaches to online speech regulation, and trends in online safety proposals.
Differences in approaches to online safety between governments can lead to inconsistencies and confusion in regulations, potentially impacting free speech and online platforms used by individuals.
State-specific regulations on tech platforms in the US, driven by concerns around bias and hate speech, can create a patchwork of laws that have implications for speech and the internet as a whole.
Deep dives
Differences in Approaches to Online Child Safety
The podcast discusses the differences between the U.S. and European efforts in protecting young people online. It highlights concerns about legislation requiring age verification for everyone under 18, which inadvertently affects adults as well. The market and civil society have already provided various tools to address different family concerns about their children online. The courts have recently challenged laws in Arkansas and California on First Amendment grounds, emphasizing the concerning consequences of well-intentioned legislation for free speech online.
UK's Online Safety Bill
The UK has passed the online safety bill, which mandates regulations on internet platforms and poses hefty fines for non-compliance. American tech companies operating globally will have to align with British law, potentially impacting the online platforms used by Americans. The concept of the 'Brussels effect' is discussed, where European policies impact online speech beyond Europe's borders, often leading to companies adopting the most restrictive rules. Concerns are raised about the implications for speech and the ongoing US-UK debate on youth online safety.
State-by-State Tech Regulation in the US
Several US states have attempted to regulate tech platforms, particularly on speech platforms, with varying motivations. The concern lies in the potential creation of a confusing and inconsistent patchwork of laws at the state level, resulting in changes to the internet as a whole. Red states like Texas and Florida focus on concerns around conservative bias, while blue states aim to tackle hate speech and misinformation. The differing interpretations of laws and the implications for speech make state-specific regulation problematic.
The approaches taken by governments to online safety vary widely. Matthew Feeney and Jennifer Huddleston discuss how various states and countries are handling the issue and assess the risks to privacy.