Sons of Patriarchy Reformed is (Not) Enough
Jan 6, 2025
R. Scott Clark, a church historian and theology professor at Westminster Seminary California, dives deep into the complexities of Federal Vision theology. He traces its origins and critiques its reinterpretation of Reformed confessions, revealing concerns about works-based Christianity. The discussion explores the distinction between factions within Federal Vision, the implications of infant communion, and the risk of a legalistic approach to faith. Clark highlights how this theological perspective can lead to pastoral abuse and a loss of assurance, ultimately urging a return to grace.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Baptism As Conditional Covenant Benefits
- Federal Vision reframes baptism as conferring extensive, conditional benefits rather than mere sign and seal.
- This shifts salvation toward a cooperative, legal covenant that threatens Reformed sola fide and assurance.
Fluid Labels Hide Doctrinal Shifts
- Federal Vision factions (amber ale vs oatmeal stout) avoid fixed definitions to stay theologically flexible.
- That slipperiness lets proponents claim Reformed identity while pursuing departures from confessions.
Muddling Law And Gospel
- Federal Vision blurs the covenant of works and covenant of grace by introducing 'maturity' and conditional grace into Adam's covenant.
- That confusion undermines the imputation of Christ's obedience and reintroduces a legalist framework.
