

One Thing: Charlie Kirk Was Killed. Now What?
Sep 14, 2025
Lilliana Mason, a political science professor at Johns Hopkins University specializing in political violence, discusses the implications of Charlie Kirk's assassination. She explores the motivations behind Kirk's influence on young conservatives and the challenges of addressing political rhetoric. The conversation delves into the normalization of violence in political discourse, the societal impact of incendiary rhetoric, and the urgent need for leaders to advocate for anti-violence norms in an increasingly polarized environment.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Turning Point Sparked A Young Activist
- Alex Stone describes meeting Charlie Kirk at AmericaFest and how Kirk's praise boosted his confidence.
- He credits Turning Point USA for launching his political involvement and media presence.
Talking As A Bulwark Against Violence
- Charlie Kirk argued that when people stop talking, that's when you get violence.
- His willingness to debate drew opponents to engage with him despite controversy.
Retaliation Raises Acceptance Of Violence
- Liliana Mason warns cycles of political violence are contagious because people justify retaliation.
- Survey responses shift from 10–20% to 50–60% acceptance if perceived as retaliation.