

John Roberts’ New Year Blame Game
16 snips Jan 4, 2025
Sherrilyn Ifill, a renowned civil rights litigator and 14th Amendment expert, dives into critical discussions about the Supreme Court’s legitimacy with Dahlia Lithwick. They dissect Chief Justice John Roberts' year-end report, highlighting the troubling trend of the judiciary equating criticism with threats. Ifill raises concerns over judicial impartiality and accountability, particularly regarding recent controversial decisions. Together, they emphasize the need for constructive feedback to uphold fairness and integrity in the legal landscape.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Criticism vs. Intimidation
- The Supreme Court's recent behavior reveals a manipulative attempt to equate criticism with intimidation.
- This tactic aims to silence critiques of their decisions and processes.
Judge Waties Waring
- Chief Justice Roberts cites Judge Waties Waring, who faced ostracization for his civil rights decisions.
- Waring's dissent in Briggs v. Elliott shaped the landmark Brown v. Board of Education ruling.
Suppression of Critique
- The Chief Justice's report aims to suppress critiques of the court's conduct.
- Equating criticism with violence is a tactic to stifle dissent.