The podcast discusses the make or break moment for carbon capture and whether it can slow climate change. It explores the concept of carbon capture and storage, the importance of CCS in achieving green goals, and the challenges and environmental impact of Chevron's Gorgon facility. The potential impact of carbon capture technology and the feasibility and financial considerations of carbon capture projects are also explored. The role of carbon capture and storage in addressing emissions and securing funding and support is discussed as well.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is facing challenges in implementing bespoke solutions for different types of projects and capturing less than 1% of global emissions.
CCS technology is controversial due to concerns about diverting funds from cleaner alternatives and questions about its necessity in a transition to cleaner energy sources.
Deep dives
The Challenge of Carbon Capture and Storage
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a complex system of capturing, transporting, and storing carbon dioxide emissions. The technology has been around since the 1970s, but its implementation has faced numerous challenges. One of the main obstacles is the diverse nature of each facility, requiring bespoke solutions for different types of projects. Despite decades of effort and billions of dollars invested, CCS has only captured less than 1% of global emissions. The industry acknowledges the need for scale, with forecasts estimating that 300 facilities the size of Chevron's Gorgon CCS plant will be necessary by 2030 to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. However, the industry faces technical difficulties, high costs, and skepticism concerning its viability as a long-term solution.
Industry Investment and Controversy
The oil and gas industry, driven by self-interest, invests in CCS technology to sustain fossil fuel use. Governments also support CCS due to its potential in sectors that are hard to decarbonize, such as cement production and certain petrochemical processes. However, critics argue that investing in CCS diverts funds from the development of cleaner, alternative technologies. The controversy lies in whether CCS prolongs fossil fuel use or genuinely contributes to reducing carbon emissions. While CCS has been focused on capturing emissions from sources like power plants, its application to other industries, such as steel and cement, raises questions about the allocation of resources and the necessity of CCS in a transition to cleaner energy sources.
Technical and Financial Challenges
Developing effective and efficient CCS technologies presents significant technical and financial challenges. Each facility requires intricate systems for capturing, transporting, and storing carbon dioxide. Additionally, the scale of CCS implementation is massive. The International Energy Agency estimates that $4.5 trillion will be needed to invest in CCS over the next eight years, with an additional 300 facilities needed to reach the necessary capacity. Despite some progress, such as Chevron's Gorgon CCS facility, which is the largest of its kind in the world, many projects fail to meet targets and struggle to achieve full capacity. Ensuring successful implementation and overcoming technical hurdles, while managing costs, remains a critical task for the industry.
Since the 1970s, carbon capture and storage (CSS) has been held up as one potential tool to help combat global warming. The idea is to capture carbon dioxide released in the production of fossil fuels like coal, oil and natural gas, and store it deep underground–instead of letting it escape into the atmosphere. But despite billions of dollars spent, the technology hasn’t quite lived up to expectations. Bloomberg’s Stephen Stapczynski and David Stringer report that now is the make or break time for carbon capture to prove its worth, and they join this episode to talk about whether it’s up to the challenge of slowing climate change.