Joshua Keating, a senior correspondent at Vox, offers keen insights into Kamala Harris's foreign policy and contrasts it with Donald Trump's approach. Jeffrey Friedman, a professor of government at Dartmouth, places Harris's stance within the historical context of foreign policy's electoral impact. They discuss the implications of her policies on major conflicts like Israel and Ukraine, her attempt to solidify U.S.-Southeast Asia relations, and how her foreign policy evolution could influence voter perceptions as Election Day approaches.
The upcoming U.S. presidential election poses significant implications for global politics, especially regarding differing foreign policy approaches of candidates.
Kamala Harris's foreign policy remains ambiguous, influenced by her role as vice president and historical political norms, complicating her campaign narrative.
Voter perception often prioritizes strength and capability in leadership over specific foreign policy positions, shaping candidate effectiveness in the election.
Deep dives
Impact of U.S. Presidential Election on Global Affairs
The upcoming U.S. presidential election is expected to have significant implications for global politics. Observers from various countries, particularly in Europe, have expressed that the choice of the next U.S. president will profoundly influence their national policies and international relationships. Both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump represent vastly different foreign policy approaches, with Trump advocating for an 'America First' policy that emphasizes isolationism and protectionism, while Harris aligns more with a traditional foreign policy model that values U.S. global leadership. However, the specifics of Harris's foreign policy remain somewhat ambiguous, leading to questions about how she would navigate critical international conflicts.
Foreign Policy's Limited Salience in U.S. Elections
Foreign policy has historically not been a primary concern for U.S. voters during presidential elections, even though it plays a crucial role in shaping a president's actions once in office. Candidates like Barack Obama have risen to prominence through their stances on ongoing conflicts, such as the Iraq War, suggesting that significant military involvement can elevate foreign policy in elections. In the context of the 2024 elections, while foreign policy issues are gaining attention, the conventional wisdom holds that they will not sway the majority of voters' choices significantly. Nevertheless, subtle differences in candidates' foreign policy positions could sway critical swing states where foreign policy is perceived as a key issue.
Questions surrounding Kamala Harris's foreign policy approach hinge on how it might differ from that of Joe Biden, whose administration she serves. Analysts note that while Harris shares a foundation with Biden's policies, her potential for differentiation is constrained by her role as vice president, as any criticism of the current administration could alienate voters. Her past as a prosecutor influences her perspective on foreign policy, emphasizing adherence to legal norms, which contrasts with Biden's framing of international relations as a battle between democracy and authoritarianism. As the election draws near, how Harris articulates her positions on pivotal issues like the Israel-Palestine conflict and relations with China will be critical for voters looking to understand her proposed shifts.
Challenges in Defining a Harris Doctrine
The search for a coherent Harris doctrine in foreign policy presents challenges, as much of her rhetoric aligns with mainstream Democratic ideals without offering distinct proposals. Her approach often hinges on her stance on international law and alliances, yet the specifics remain elusive. For example, her response to the Gaza conflict has been scrutinized, revealing attempts to balance varying perspectives within her party. This difficulty in defining her foreign policy not only complicates Harris's campaign but raises concerns about U.S. foreign policy direction if she were to win the presidency.
Voting Dynamics and Perceptions of Leadership
Voter perception of foreign policy candidates is often influenced by their projected strength and capability to lead as commander-in-chief rather than their specific policy positions. Throughout history, candidates have focused on establishing a strong leadership image to instill trust in their ability to handle international crises effectively. The dynamics of current elections showcase how candidates like Trump frame their approach to foreign relations to resonate with voters, despite broader public disagreement on particular policies. Ultimately, this focus on perceived leadership could overshadow substantive foreign policy debates, reflecting a tendency in voters to prioritize confidence and decisiveness over detailed political agendas.
With Election Day quickly approaching, many voters are still wondering what a potential Kamala Harris presidency would look like -- and how it would differ from the Biden administration.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
