The Politics of a Constitutional Convention Has Democrats in a Panic
Dec 19, 2024
auto_awesome
Heather Knight, New York Times San Francisco Bureau Chief, and State Senator Scott Wiener dive deep into the escalating concerns around a potential constitutional convention as Republicans gear up for power. They discuss the risks it poses to fundamental issues like abortion and immigration. Scott shares his efforts to rescind California's dormant calls for a convention, while Heather provides insights on the historical context and the implications of rewriting the Constitution in today's polarized climate. It's a thought-provoking conversation about democracy's future.
The fear of a constitutional convention stems from potential radical changes to the Constitution, impacting key issues like abortion and immigration.
State Senator Scott Wiener advocates for rescinding California's call for a constitutional convention to prevent empowering right-leaning agendas amid current political tensions.
Deep dives
Understanding Constitutional Conventions
A constitutional convention allows states to propose amendments to the U.S. Constitution if two-thirds, or 34 states, call for it. This method has never been used since the Constitution's ratification, leaving many uncertainties about how such a convention would be conducted. The founding documents do not provide clear guidelines on the rules or structure that a convention would follow, raising concerns about the potential outcome of a gathering that might exceed its initial agenda. This ambiguity has led to fears of a 'runaway convention' where unexpected topics could emerge, fundamentally altering the Constitution in ways that could conflict with modern values.
Political Shifts and Growing Concerns
Initially, the proposal for a 28th Amendment addressing gun safety seemed like a proactive step, but the political landscape has shifted significantly since then, creating anxiety among Democrats. With a potentially conservative federal government, including a possible Trump presidency, the fear of a constitutional convention leading to radical changes is amplified. State Senator Scott Wiener has taken the initiative to rescind California's call for a constitutional convention, citing the risks of empowering right-leaning individuals during such a pivotal time. His perspective is shaped by the current political climate and the understanding that unchecked constitutional changes could have lasting consequences.
State Responses and Legislative Actions
Several states, including California, have previously expressed intentions to hold a constitutional convention on various issues but are now reconsidering due to apprehensions about possible ramifications. Concerns have emerged that if enough states were to convene under potentially varying topics, the fundamental structure of the Constitution could be affected. Some states such as New Jersey, Illinois, and Oregon have already rescinded their calls for a convention, showing a trend of liberal states pulling back from this risky approach. The ongoing legislative discussions in California reflect a cautious transition towards protecting existing rights amidst fears of what a gathering of states might create.
Republicans will soon have control of Congress and the White House, leaving Democrats concerned that they might call for a constitutional convention to rewrite our country’s constitution and fundamentally change anything from abortion access to immigration.
California has several dormant calls for a constitutional convention on the books, and now, State Senator Scott Wiener wants to rescind those calls. Scott talks with Wiener and New York Times San Francisco Bureau Chief Heather Knight about the politics of a constitutional convention.