Core EM - Emergency Medicine Podcast cover image

Core EM - Emergency Medicine Podcast

Episode 180.0: Urine Tox Screens

Jan 12, 2021
Dr. Philip DiSalvo, an emergency physician and toxicologist, discusses the reliability and limitations of urine drug screens in emergency medicine. Topics include false positives/negatives, interference, and the need for additional testing methods. The impact of timing and drug detection duration is explored, along with the role of urine drug screens in ED management and psychiatry.
19:40

Episode guests

Podcast summary created with Snipd AI

Quick takeaways

  • Urine drug screens have limited utility in the emergency department and should not be solely relied upon for diagnosing drug intoxication.
  • The timing of drug ingestion or exposure affects urine drug screen results, and the detection period varies for different drugs.

Deep dives

Understanding the Urine Drug Screen

The podcast episode explores the controversy surrounding urine drug screens (UTOCs) in emergency medicine. The history and development of standardized urine drug screens are discussed, highlighting the NIDA-5 panel that tests for marijuana, PCP, opiates, amphetamines, and cocaine. Variability in urine drug screen panels across different clinical sites is noted. False positives and false negatives are common with urine drug screens due to incomplete understanding and interference from other substances. Specific examples of false positives are mentioned, including poppy seeds for opiates and medications like Dextromethorphan, Quinine, bupropion, and medications containing ephedrine or pseudoephedrine for amphetamines. The podcast emphasizes that urine drug screens should not be relied upon solely for diagnosing drug intoxication, as they can lead to incorrect interpretations and have limited utility in the emergency department.

Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts

Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
App store bannerPlay store banner