Hunter Rendleman, a political scientist at UC Berkeley, delves into the relationship between good policy and electoral success. He discusses the Earned Income Tax Credit’s role in alleviating poverty and how this impacts voter behavior. The conversation explores voter sophistication and perceptions of policies, revealing that citizens can reward political leaders for beneficial initiatives, even when credit attribution is complex. Additionally, Rendleman highlights challenges in political representation and academic publishing, making for a thought-provoking discussion.
The podcast examines the disconnect between effective policy implementation and electoral rewards, illustrated by the Teamsters Union's endorsement of Trump despite Democratic support.
A policy feedback loop is essential for sustaining political engagement among beneficiaries, requiring clear attribution of benefits to the responsible politicians.
The historical impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit reveals that many voters fail to connect government policies with their own economic relief, complicating accountability.
Deep dives
Biden's Support for Unions and Deliverism Concept
Joe Biden's administration provided significant financial assistance to the Teamsters Union as part of the American Rescue Plan, allocating $36 billion to protect union pensions. This support helped tens of thousands of workers and retirees in states like Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin, prompting the expectation that such political gains would translate into electoral rewards for the Democrats. However, Teamsters president Sean O'Brien's endorsement of Donald Trump at the RNC created tensions, perceived as a betrayal of the administration's union-friendly policies. The concept of deliverism, the belief that political leaders will be rewarded at the polls for delivering effective policies, is challenged by this incident, highlighting the disconnect between policy success and electoral outcomes.
Understanding Policy Feedback Loops
The discussion introduced the notion of a policy feedback loop, where the implementation of certain policies creates a constituency motivated to ensure those policies remain intact. It was exemplified with the GI Bill's impact on veterans, illustrating how beneficiaries could reevaluate their political engagement and identity. For a feedback loop to work effectively, voters must understand the origins and implications of policies, and the political landscape must provide clear attribution of responsibility to the correct officials. However, confusion surrounding who is responsible for a policy's benefits, such as Medicaid expansion, complicates voter awareness and responsiveness, raising concerns about the effectiveness of specific policies in generating sustainable electoral shifts.
Evaluation of the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC)
The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) has historically been a popular bipartisan policy that provides financial relief to low-income individuals based on their earnings in the preceding tax year. During the conversation, it was revealed that a significant number of people may not directly connect the benefits from the EITC to government actions due to complex tax systems, leading to a lack of political accountability. The discussion emphasized that despite the EITC lifting 5.6 million Americans out of poverty, measuring its true electoral impact remains challenging as many recipients struggle to trace its origin back to specific politicians or policies. This obscurity potentially undermines the policy feedback loop intended to reward officials who took action for their constituents' well-being.
Research Findings on EITC's Electoral Impact
The research on state-level EITC implementations over a span of 26 years revealed that the introduction of the program led to a modest increase of around two percentage points in vote share for incumbent governors. While this effect was arguably small, it was more pronounced in areas where more residents claimed the EITC, particularly highlighting swings toward Republican governors. The results indicated that voters in economically disadvantaged areas who benefited from the EITC were statistically more likely to support incumbent Republicans, an unexpected shift considering the association of low-income voters with the Democratic Party. These findings suggest that policy enactments can create symbolic political effects, leading voters to perceive certain governors more favorably because they enacted supportive policies.
Symbolic Politics and Democratization Challenges
The podcast discussed the complexities underlying voter perception of policy efficacy and politicians' motivations, especially concerning the expansion of welfare programs. The dynamic of policy feedback suggests that while political elites may enact beneficial legislation, actual voter approval may not always correlate due to the ideological divides and broader political landscapes. Examples such as the child tax credit illustrate how effective policies can face challenges in maintaining political support, regardless of their tangible benefits to constituents. This emphasizes the need for clearer channels of communication and understanding between voters and elected officials to promote more engagement and trust in democracy amidst partisan divides.
The key idea behind democracy is that if politicians pass good policy, people will reward them with votes. But is that actually true? The political scientist Hunter Rendleman looked at what happened when governors extended a social-welfare benefit that has lifted millions of working-class Americans out of poverty.
Share understanding this holiday season. For less than $2 a week, give a yearlong Atlantic subscription to someone special. They’ll get unlimited access to Atlantic journalism, including magazine issues, narrated articles, puzzles, and more. Give today at TheAtlantic.com/podgift.