Simply Bitcoin Did Bitcoin Epstein Itself?! | Simply Originals
Feb 5, 2026
Expert Interviewee (Bitcoin Insider) — a technical and historical commentator on Bitcoin governance and funding. They explain why donations and institutional ties could not and did not subvert the protocol. Discussion covers leaked Epstein-related donations, market reactions, trust and funding, surveillance risks, and why the protocol kept running despite scandal.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
News Shocks Prices Not Protocols
- Public revelations about powerful people triggered a Bitcoin price dip but not a protocol failure.
- Rustin argues the protocol's resilience matters more than headlines or personalities.
Vocal Defense Against Reputation Risk
- Guest Commentator describes refusing to let Epstein 'rob' humanity of Bitcoin's invention.
- He pledges to defend Bitcoin's credibility publicly against damaging associations.
Donations ≠ Protocol Control
- The leaked files show Epstein donated to MIT and sought ties to early Bitcoin contributors but show no clear control over the protocol.
- Rustin emphasizes donations and contact don't equate to corrupting Bitcoin's consensus.