

Short Circuit 117 (11/22/19)
Nov 22, 2019
Exploring judicial engagement, a court case raises questions about the conditions of confinement. Court case challenges anti-loitering ban targeting panhandling and debates scope of relief. Dissenting judge examines constitutionality of a law and impact of injunctive relief. Discussion on government's right to enforce unconstitutional laws and property rights. Highlights importance of judicial engagement and considering justifications for laws.
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
1 2 3 4 5
Introduction
00:00 • 3min
Unlawful Confined Confinement and Constitutional Rights
02:55 • 5min
Challenging an Anti-Loitering Ban: The Right to Free Speech and Relief
08:10 • 6min
Dissenting Opinion and Scope of Injunctive Relief
14:23 • 3min
Government Enforcing Unconstitutional Laws
17:24 • 10min