Advisory Opinions The Dissent Heard Around the World
16 snips
Nov 20, 2025 In this discussion, Judge Jerry Smith's striking dissent on Texas's redistricting sparks debate over judicial conduct. The hosts unpack the complexities of voting rights and the implications of recent grand jury proceedings involving James Comey. Unexpected topics also arise, from the humor in Sudafed mishaps to the curious world of black market parrot deals. The conversation highlights the tension between legal processes and political motivations, making for an engaging exploration of current events.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Sudafed, A Banister, And Binoculars
- Sarah Isgur describes taking Sudafed despite an allergy and later falling into a banister, causing a gruesome nosebleed.
- Her son nonchalantly peeked with toilet-paper binoculars and went back to sleep, underscoring domestic chaos around the mishap.
Mid-Cycle Redistricting Raises Unique Stakes
- Texas conducted a mid-cycle redistricting in 2025, triggering nationwide partisan responses.
- Three-judge panels hear congressional redistricting suits and appeals go directly to the Supreme Court, creating unique procedural stakes.
Purcell And Section 2 Shape Redistricting Law
- The Purcell principle counsels courts not to change election rules close to elections, making timing crucial.
- Section 2 Voting Rights claims require a politically cohesive minority and a geographically compact group to form a majority in a district.
