Rashid Khalidi on the Palestinian Cause in a Volatile Middle East, and the Meaning of Settler Colonialism

23 snips

Dec 16, 2024

Rashid Khalidi, Professor emeritus at Columbia University and author of influential works on Palestinian history, joins Adam Kirsch, a writer and editor at The Wall Street Journal. They delve into the shifting power dynamics in the Middle East, discussing the limited support for the Palestinian cause from regional allies like Iran and Hezbollah. Khalidi emphasizes the historical roots of settler colonialism in relation to Zionism, challenging perceptions of the conflict. They also explore justice, equality, and the complexities inherent in the ongoing struggle for Palestinian identity.

Ask episode

AI Snips

Chapters

Books

Transcript

Episode notes

ANECDOTE

Khalidi's Ancestor's Plea

Rashid Khalidi's ancestor, Yusuf Diyal Khaldi, was mayor of Jerusalem and a scholar of Judaism.
He wrote to Herzl in 1899, acknowledging Jewish connection to Palestine but urging Zionists to leave it alone.

INSIGHT

Zionism as Colonization

Early Zionists viewed their project as colonization, as evidenced by terms like "Jewish Colonization Agency".
This reflects their understanding of settling in Palestine, not an anti-Semitic slur.

INSIGHT

Zionism's Unique Nature

Zionism is unique among settler colonial projects due to its lack of a mother country.
It's a transactional relationship with imperial powers, not an extension of existing sovereignty.

Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode

Get the app

Power dynamics in the Middle East shifted dramatically this year. In Lebanon, Israel dealt a severe blow toHezbollah, and another crucial ally of Iran—Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria—was toppled by insurgents. But the historian Rashid Khalidi is skeptical that these changes will set back the Palestinian cause, as it relates to Israel. “This idea that the Palestinians are bereft of allies assumes that they had people who were doing things for their interest,” Khalidi tells David Remnick, “which I don’t think was true.” The limited responses to the war in Gaza by Iran and Hezbollah, Khalidi believes, clearly demonstrate that Iran’s so-called Axis of Resistance “was designed by Iran to protect the Iranian regime. . . . It wasn’t designed to protect Palestine.” Khalidi, a professor emeritus at Columbia University, is the author of a number of books on Palestinian history; among them, “The Hundred Years’ War on Palestine” has been particularly influential. The book helped bring the term “settler colonialism” into common parlance, at least on the left, to describe Israel’s relationship to historic Palestine. Sometimes invoked as a term of opprobrium, “settler colonialism” is strongly disputed by supporters of Israel. Khalidi asserts that the description is historically specific and accurate. The early Zionists, he says, understood their effort as colonization. “That’s not some antisemitic slur,” he says. “That’s the description they gave themselves.”
The concept of settler colonialism has been applied, on the political left, to describe Israel’s founding, and to its settlement of the Palestinian-occupied territories. This usage has been disputed by supporters of Israel and by thinkers including Adam Kirsch, an editor at the Wall Street Journal, who has also written about philosophy for The New Yorker. “Settler colonialism is . . . a zero-sum way of looking at the conflict,” Kirsch tells David Remnick. “In the classic examples, it involves the destruction of one people by another and their replacement over a large territory, really a continent-wide territory. That’s not at all the history of Israel and Palestine.” Kirsch made his case in a recent book, “On Settler Colonialism: Ideology, Violence, and Justice.”

Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices