The Daily Blast: Trump’s Sudden Eruption of Rage at Jack Smith Reveals a Deeper Fear
Sep 27, 2024
auto_awesome
In this discussion, Politico reporter Kyle Cheney dives into Donald Trump's explosive tirade against Special Counsel Jack Smith. Cheney unpacks the implications of Trump's recent social media outburst, linked to Smith's upcoming court filing on January 6th. They delve into testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson and the chaotic events surrounding the Capitol riot. The conversation also touches on the intertwining of legal battles, electoral integrity, and the potential impact on American democracy. It's a revealing look at the legal storm brewing around Trump.
Trump's recent invocation of National Guard troops attempts to shift blame for January 6th while contradicting established committee findings debunking his claims.
The upcoming court filing by Jack Smith is poised to reveal crucial evidence against Trump, raising serious questions about his actions during the Capitol insurrection.
Deep dives
Trump's Claims and National Guard Controversy
Trump recently claimed that he requested 10,000 National Guard troops to the Capitol on January 6th, suggesting this as evidence of his innocence regarding the insurrection. However, reports from the January 6th committee have debunked this assertion, illustrating that there was never an actual offer or serious plan to deploy such troops. Furthermore, discussions among National Guard leaders indicated that if Trump had directly called for assistance, there could have been a faster response to protect the Capitol. It is clear that Trump's true intent leaned towards ensuring the safety of his supporters rather than the security of the Capitol itself.
Legal Developments and Public Interest
Jack Smith has recently submitted a dossier to the court, laying out evidence against Trump related to the events of January 6th. This filing is driven by the need to clarify which aspects of Trump's actions may be protected by presidential immunity, as mandated by a Supreme Court ruling. Despite concerns raised by Trump's legal team about potential election interference, Judge Chutkin has consistently emphasized the importance of public interest in these proceedings. There is a strong possibility that significant details will emerge from this filing, shedding more light on the circumstances surrounding the insurrection.
Potential Impact on Future Elections
A new Gallup poll indicates a severe decline in trust among Republicans regarding the accuracy of vote counting, illustrating the legacy of Trump's actions during and after January 6th. Trump's rhetoric around the upcoming election appears to mirror his previous strategy, aiming to sow doubt about the election's legitimacy even before votes are cast. As public confidence wanes, concerns have arisen that this could lead to further civil unrest reminiscent of January 6th, particularly if Trump continues to claim that future election outcomes hinge on his victory. The combination of Trump's past behavior and his current narrative signals a troubling potential for future electoral disruptions.
Donald Trump has been quiet about January 6th lately. But this week, he suddenly unleashed an epicrant on social media about Special Counsel Jack Smith, raging about false new claims on the right that the “deep state” deliberately allowed the insurrection to go forward—against Trump’s will. The real cause of Trump’s fury? Smith is set to submit a court filing detailing his evidence of Trump’s alleged January 6th related crimes—some of which may become public. We talked to Politico reporter Kyle Cheney, author of a new report on these machinations, who helps illuminate what new revelations we may soon learn about—and why Trump should worry about them.