Brett Bowden, "Now Is Not the Time: Inside Our Obsession with the Present" (Iff Books, 2024)
Nov 30, 2024
auto_awesome
Brett Bowden, Professor of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry at Western Sydney University and author of "Now Is Not the Time: Inside Our Obsession with the Present," delves into our fixation on the present moment. He critiques tempocentrism, highlighting how it skews our understanding of history and progress. Bowden discusses the paradox of humanity’s urgency versus the slow pace of geological time and advocates for a more integrated view of our relationship with nature. His insights challenge listeners to consider the broader context of time in decision-making.
The obsession with the present, termed tempocentrism, distorts our understanding of history and limits informed decision-making.
The linear perspective of progress rooted in Eurocentrism marginalizes diverse cultural practices and necessitates a reassessment of historical narratives.
Deep dives
The Tyranny of the Instant
The concept of the 'tyranny of the instant' reflects a societal obsession with the present moment, often at the expense of understanding the past and future. This preoccupation is driven by daily responsibilities and distractions, making it challenging to reflect on longer-term implications. Drawing from the terminology of noted theorists, the idea suggests that many people view the present as historically significant, sometimes believing it's the pinnacle of human experience. However, such a narrow focus limits the ability to make informed judgments about our situation, as meaningful assessments require historical context and time for reflection.
Tempo-Centrism and Eurocentrism
The connection between tempo-centrism and Eurocentrism is rooted in Enlightenment thought, which has historically shaped modern perceptions of progress and civilization. This perspective often promotes a linear view of history, where societies progress from primitive beginnings to advanced civilization, positioning Western models as the standard. Such thinking influences development theories that dictate there is one correct pathway to modernization, marginalizing diverse cultural practices. The implications of this mindset underscore a pressing need to reassess how history and progress are defined beyond Eurocentric ideals, recognizing the validity of pluralistic views.
Humanity's Disconnect with Nature
A paradox exists in how humanity interacts with nature amid a modern culture of instant gratification and rapid decision-making. As humans increasingly desire to control their environment, the long geological timescales of nature contrast sharply with our immediate concerns, creating a disconnect. This urgent need for quick solutions often leads to reactive, rather than reflective, thinking, impacting decision-making processes. Acknowledging the interdependence of civilization and nature is vital, as it could foster a more harmonious relationship with the natural world, allowing for sustainable living that respects all elements of the ecosystem.
Human beings have an overwhelming tendency to overemphasize the significance of the present without considering context or historical perspective. For many, here and now is as good as it gets - we have steadily progressed from a savage past, and all we have to look forward to is the great unknown. But if our literature and cinema are anything to go by, many are convinced that the future will indeed be dystopian. At the same time, arguments abound that living in the moment is a key to happiness and success.
However, to privilege the present over the past or future, Brett Bowden argues in Now Is Not the Time: Inside Our Obsession with the Present(Iff Books, 2024), is to engage in tempocentrism. More than a mere preoccupation with the present, tempocentrism involves comparing and judging the past in relation to the present, with the tendency to assume that the present isn’t only materially and qualitatively different from the past but also superior to it, often morally so.
Yet tempocentrism, a mistaken belief in the unprecedented nature of events going on around us, brings with it a skewed perspective loaded with bias and prejudice. Requiring just as much ignorance and arrogance as Eurocentrism - tempocentrism implies that the present is somehow superior to the past because we live in it now. The point, however, is not to suggest that there is not something special about the present - there might well be - but now is not the time to decide whether it is more significant than previous moments, or those still to come. Depending on the issue or event in question, the time for that is later … possibly hundreds or thousands of years later.