DA Bragg Urges NY Judge to REJECT Trump's Attempt to Toss his 34 Convictions
Aug 1, 2024
auto_awesome
New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg, known for tackling high-profile legal cases, joins legal expert Glenn Kirschner as they dissect Donald Trump's attempts to dismiss 34 felony convictions. They discuss the implications of a recent Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and predict Judge Juan Merchan's likely rejection of Trump's motion. The conversation unpacks the legal complexities surrounding private conduct in relation to presidential duties, setting the stage for a significant sentencing date.
DA Bragg's legal team asserts that Trump's felony convictions relate to personal conduct, not presidential immunity, urging the judge to proceed with sentencing.
The principle of harmless error indicates that any minor trial mistakes are unlikely to undermine the strong evidence supporting Trump's convictions.
Deep dives
The Process of Getting Clear Aligners
Bite Clear Aligners offer an affordable and convenient way for individuals to achieve a better smile from home. The initial step involves ordering an at-home impression kit for a low price, allowing users to start their treatment journey easily. The aligners are delivered directly to the customer, and the overall treatment is significantly less expensive than traditional braces, with additional flexible payment options available. With a promotional code, users can receive substantial discounts on their impression kit, highlighting the accessible nature of the service.
Trump's Legal Situation Explained
Donald Trump's impending sentencing for his felony convictions hinges on the interpretation of a recent Supreme Court ruling regarding presidential immunity. The ruling suggests that while presidents may not be prosecuted for official conduct, any actions categorized as private conduct remain subject to legal accountability. Prosecutors argue that Trump's actions concerning hush money payments are not official presidential conduct, as most of the related activities occurred before he took office. The courts are expected to uphold the convictions since a significant amount of evidence supports the jury's verdict.
Understanding the Harmless Error Doctrine
The legal principle of harmless error is crucial in determining whether mistakes made during a trial are significant enough to affect the outcome. Even if minor legal errors occurred during Trump's trial, the overwhelming evidence against him would likely mitigate their impact under this doctrine. This suggests that even if some evidence were deemed inadmissible, the overall case would still stand strong against him due to the substantial proof of wrongdoing. As the court prepares to rule on Trump's motions, this legal framework will play a critical role in affirming the original convictions.
1.
Examining Trump's Legal Challenges and Supreme Court Implications
New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg and his team of prosecutors have filed a lengthy opposition to Donald Trump's motion to dismiss his 34 felony convictions as a result of the Supreme Court's new presidential immunity ruling.
Glenn discusses why Judge Juan Merchan is likely to reject Trump's motion to dismiss and proceed to sentencing on September 18th.
If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at: