The Reasonable Faith Podcast discusses revisions to the Kalam Cosmological Argument, including objections and clarifications. They explore the nature of time, the impossibility of an actually infinite collection of objects, and the paradoxes of time travel. The concept of an infinite past and its effects are examined, along with the influence of William Lane Craig and the absurdity of an infinite temporal regress of events.
An infinite past would imply the existence of an actual infinite number of things today, even if they do not exist simultaneously.
A tense view of time, where temporal becoming is real and objective, undermines the objection that an infinite past implies an infinite future.
Deep dives
The Implications of an Infinite Past
Trent Horn suggests that an infinite regress of past events would imply the possibility of a simultaneously existing, actually infinite number of things today. According to him, the objection that past events do not exist at the same time is irrelevant as long as the objects are definite and discrete, adding up to an actual infinite collection. He argues that even if the objects do not exist simultaneously, the absurdities remain. For example, he mentions the thought experiment of an infinite number of iron pellets piling up outside a hotel, highlighting that considering subsets within the collection results in an equally infinite number of objects. Therefore, he maintains that an infinite past is metaphysically impossible and defends the view that the temporal becoming is real and objective.
The Symmetry Objection and the Tensed View of Time
Addressing the symmetry objection, the podcast explores the difference between the past and the future regarding the nature of time. It emphasizes the division among philosophers on whether time is tensed or tenseless, with views evenly split on the subject. The speaker argues that a tense view of time, where temporal becoming is real and objective, undermines the symmetry objection. On this view, the past consists of actualized events, whereas the future is purely potential, with events not yet existing. By claiming that the future is endless but potentially infinite, the objection that an infinite past implies an infinite future is dismissed. The analysis suggests that a tenseless theory of time, which considers all three temporal dimensions equally real, would lead to problems like the possibility of backward causation and thus does not remove the objection.
The Impossible Effects and Causal Chains
In this segment, Trent Horn focuses on the effects of an infinite past instead of the past events themselves. The podcast presents various thought experiments, including Hilbert's Hotel and the blacksmith's broken hammers, to illustrate the absurdity of an infinite collection. It argues that an infinite past would allow for impossible things to exist, even if the collection of past events may not exist simultaneously. Additionally, the podcast introduces the causal chain argument, suggesting that infinite causal chains are not possible because they would lead to contradictions. By demonstrating that a causal chain necessarily requires a first member, the podcast concludes that an infinite past cannot contain causal chains without first members. Overall, the revisions proposed by Trent Horn reinforce the idea that the past cannot be infinite.