The Take What Charlie Kirk’s death says about political division in the US
10 snips
Sep 11, 2025 Dr. Matthew Boedy, a Professor of Rhetoric at the University of North Georgia, discusses the shocking assassination of Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative figure. They delve into the implications of political violence, exploring how Kirk’s death reflects growing divisions in the U.S. political landscape. The conversation highlights the chilling effects of aggressive rhetoric on free speech, especially among younger conservatives. Boedy also shares insights on navigating personal grief amidst political tensions, shedding light on the complex intersection of tragedy and democracy.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Personal Reaction To The Killing
- Matthew Boedy describes crying when he learned Charlie Kirk died and feeling for Kirk's family and his own children.
- He says the assassination felt like a national flashing red light for democracy and a line crossed in political life.
Turning Point Became A Big Political Engine
- Matthew Boedy explains Charlie Kirk built Turning Point USA into a broad political operation beyond college chapters with large budgets and global branches.
- He links Kirk's influence to media platforms, donor funding, and international expansion.
Western Civilization As A Racialized Cause
- Boedy says Kirk's idea of 'Western civilization' mixed democracy and free speech with a racial and Christian cultural element.
- He argues Kirk framed Western civilization as a return to a Christian, racially coded national identity.