The Michael Knowles Show Ep. 1874 - Alleged Charlie Kirk Assassin Smirks During First Court Hearing
Dec 12, 2025
The alleged assassin of Charlie Kirk makes a compelling court appearance, raising questions about media narratives and defense tactics involving deepfakes. Tensions in Venezuela are discussed, linking geopolitical stakes to a Catholic mystic's dire predictions. There's a critique of cultural shifts evident in Netflix's latest release, which reverses traditional moral roles. Knowles also debates what truly defines American identity while addressing various listener questions on baptism and immigration, providing insightful commentary throughout.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Courtroom Demeanor Signals Guilt
- Michael Knowles argues the suspect's courtroom smirk strongly suggests guilt and undermines narratives of wrongful accusation.
- He says demeanor, coupled with reported DNA, texts, and fingerprints, makes innocence less plausible.
Defense Claim May Backfire
- Knowles critiques the defense claim about altered images as counterproductive because a display of strong emotion (crying) could suggest innocence.
- He reasons a smirk fits the alleged profile and weakens the defense narrative.
Pittsburgh Attack Example
- Michael recounts an attack at the University of Pittsburgh where a leftist threw an explosive while he walked on stage.
- He uses that event to illustrate a pattern of politically motivated violence from radical leftists.