The Nonlinear Library: LessWrong LW - US Presidential Election: Tractability, Importance, and Urgency by kuhanj
May 30, 2024
05:49
Link to original article
Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: US Presidential Election: Tractability, Importance, and Urgency, published by kuhanj on May 30, 2024 on LessWrong.
Disclaimer: To avoid harmful polarization of important topics, this post is written in a non-partisan manner, and I'd encourage comments to be written with this in mind.
US presidential elections are surprisingly tractable
1. US presidential elections are often extremely close.
1. Biden won the last election by 42,918 combined votes in three swing states. Trump won the election before that by 77,744 votes. 537 votes in Florida decided the 2000 election.
2. There's a good chance the 2024 election will be very close too.
1. Trump leads national polling by around 1% nationally, and polls are tighter than they were the last two elections. If polls were perfectly accurate (which of course, they aren't), the tipping point state would be Pennsylvania or Michigan, which are currently at +1-2% for Trump.
3. There is still low-hanging fruit. Estimates for how effectively top RCT-tested interventions to generate net swing-state votes this election range from a few hundred to several thousand dollars per vote. Top non-RCT-able interventions are likely even better. Many potentially useful strategies have not been sufficiently explored. Some examples:
1. mobilizing US citizens abroad (who vote at a ~10x lower rate than citizens in the country), or swing-state university students (perhaps through a walk-out-of-classes-to-the-polls demonstration).
2. There is no easily-searchable resource on how to best contribute to the election. (Look up the best ways to contribute to the election online - the answers are not very helpful.)
3. Anecdotally, people with little political background have been able to generate many ideas that haven't been tried and were received positively by experts.
4. Many top organizations in the space are only a few years old, which suggests they have room to grow and that more opportunities haven't been picked.
5. Incentives push talent away from political work:
1. Jobs in political campaigns are cyclical/temporary, very demanding, poorly compensated, and offer uncertain career capital (i.e. low rewards for working on losing campaigns).
2. How many of your most talented friends work in electoral politics?
6. The election is more tractable than a lot of other work: Feedback loops are more measurable and concrete, and the theory of change fairly straightforward. Many other efforts that significant resources have gone into have little positive impact to show for them (though of course ex-ante a lot of these efforts seemed very reasonable to prioritize) - e.g. efforts around OpenAI, longtermist branding, certain AI safety research directions, and more.
Much more important than other elections
This election seems unusually important for several reasons (though
people always say this):
There's arguably a decent chance that very critical decisions about transformative AI will be made in 2025-2028. The role of governments might be especially important for AI if other prominent (state and lab) actors cannot be trusted. Biden's administration issued a landmark executive order on AI in October 2023. Trump has vowed to repeal it on Day One.
Compared to other governments, the US government is unusually influential. The US government spent over $6 trillion in the 2023 fiscal year, and makes key decisions involving billions of dollars each year for issues like global development, animal welfare, climate change, and international conflicts.
Critics argue that Trump and his allies are unique in their response to the 2020 election, plans to fill the government with tens of thousands of vetted loyalists, and in how people who have worked with Trump have described him. On the other side, Biden's critics point to his age (81 years, four years older than Trump), his respo...
Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: US Presidential Election: Tractability, Importance, and Urgency, published by kuhanj on May 30, 2024 on LessWrong.
Disclaimer: To avoid harmful polarization of important topics, this post is written in a non-partisan manner, and I'd encourage comments to be written with this in mind.
US presidential elections are surprisingly tractable
1. US presidential elections are often extremely close.
1. Biden won the last election by 42,918 combined votes in three swing states. Trump won the election before that by 77,744 votes. 537 votes in Florida decided the 2000 election.
2. There's a good chance the 2024 election will be very close too.
1. Trump leads national polling by around 1% nationally, and polls are tighter than they were the last two elections. If polls were perfectly accurate (which of course, they aren't), the tipping point state would be Pennsylvania or Michigan, which are currently at +1-2% for Trump.
3. There is still low-hanging fruit. Estimates for how effectively top RCT-tested interventions to generate net swing-state votes this election range from a few hundred to several thousand dollars per vote. Top non-RCT-able interventions are likely even better. Many potentially useful strategies have not been sufficiently explored. Some examples:
1. mobilizing US citizens abroad (who vote at a ~10x lower rate than citizens in the country), or swing-state university students (perhaps through a walk-out-of-classes-to-the-polls demonstration).
2. There is no easily-searchable resource on how to best contribute to the election. (Look up the best ways to contribute to the election online - the answers are not very helpful.)
3. Anecdotally, people with little political background have been able to generate many ideas that haven't been tried and were received positively by experts.
4. Many top organizations in the space are only a few years old, which suggests they have room to grow and that more opportunities haven't been picked.
5. Incentives push talent away from political work:
1. Jobs in political campaigns are cyclical/temporary, very demanding, poorly compensated, and offer uncertain career capital (i.e. low rewards for working on losing campaigns).
2. How many of your most talented friends work in electoral politics?
6. The election is more tractable than a lot of other work: Feedback loops are more measurable and concrete, and the theory of change fairly straightforward. Many other efforts that significant resources have gone into have little positive impact to show for them (though of course ex-ante a lot of these efforts seemed very reasonable to prioritize) - e.g. efforts around OpenAI, longtermist branding, certain AI safety research directions, and more.
Much more important than other elections
This election seems unusually important for several reasons (though
people always say this):
There's arguably a decent chance that very critical decisions about transformative AI will be made in 2025-2028. The role of governments might be especially important for AI if other prominent (state and lab) actors cannot be trusted. Biden's administration issued a landmark executive order on AI in October 2023. Trump has vowed to repeal it on Day One.
Compared to other governments, the US government is unusually influential. The US government spent over $6 trillion in the 2023 fiscal year, and makes key decisions involving billions of dollars each year for issues like global development, animal welfare, climate change, and international conflicts.
Critics argue that Trump and his allies are unique in their response to the 2020 election, plans to fill the government with tens of thousands of vetted loyalists, and in how people who have worked with Trump have described him. On the other side, Biden's critics point to his age (81 years, four years older than Trump), his respo...