Tech reporter Ryan Mac, co-author of “Character Limit: How Elon Musk Destroyed Twitter,” discusses the resignation of 21 federal workers from the U.S. Digital Service in protest against DOGE management. He highlights the growing dissatisfaction and calls for transparency among staff. The conversation dives into political tensions resulting from these protests, the impact of Musk's leadership style, and the ongoing challenges faced by federal employees amid the rising conflict surrounding DOGE initiatives. Mac provides an insightful look at the intersection of innovation, loyalty, and accountability.
The resignation of 21 federal workers from the U.S. Digital Service highlights deep frustrations over governance and leadership transparency under DOGE.
Elon Musk's influence on federal operations mirrors his controversial Twitter tactics, creating discontent among employees amid concerns over governance integrity.
Deep dives
Federal Employee Resignations
A significant protest unfolded as 21 federal workers from the U.S. Digital Service resigned, signaling deep discontent with their new governance under the Department of Government Efficiency. This group, representing a third of the remaining staff, expressed frustration over a lack of transparency and clear leadership, particularly concerning orders attributed to Elon Musk and his associates. They publicly announced their resignations via a letter to the White House chief of staff and launched a website, where they positioned themselves as 'builders' in contrast to the 'destroyers' they perceived in the current administration. These resignations highlight a broader discord among federal employees, many of whom feel marginalized and unrecognized in their roles.
Resistance within Government Agencies
Federal employees, especially from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, voiced their discontent regarding the presence and conduct of Doge staffers who lacked identification and clarification of their roles. Workers documented their interactions with Doge representatives, and the union representing these employees has initiated lawsuits to protect worker privacy and uphold separation of powers. The growing resistance reflects a sentiment against the perceived encroachment by Doge into established agencies, with employees finding ways to express their dissent, including humorous responses to top-down communications. The actions taken by unions and individual employees illustrate a creeping unrest that complicates the government’s operational efficiency under Doge's influence.
Elon Musk's Role and Impact
Elon Musk's influence over federal operations, although officially ambiguous, appears substantial, with many federal employees recognizing him as the driving force behind various initiatives. His approach to governance seems to echo the tactics employed during his Twitter takeover, characterized by a lack of forethought and clear communication. Critics have noted that while Musk claims to have the support of the people, public opinion surveys suggest a significant percentage disapproves of his current actions and policies. Despite this, Musk tends to dismiss such feedback as 'fake news,' relying instead on self-curated polls through his social media platform, which skews in his favor, suggesting a disconnect between his perception and public sentiment.
Federal workers in the U.S. Digital Service resigned in protest over what they viewed as indiscriminate, irresponsible firings coming from the DOGE office. While lawsuits are entering the courts and protests are taking to the streets, will any of this make a difference to the chainsaw-minded leaders of DOGE?
Want more What Next TBD? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Evan Campbell and Patrick Fort.