Adrian Johnston, a thought-provoking author, delves into his latest book on capitalism's inhuman selfishness. He paints a vivid picture of capitalism as a consumer of its own detriment, comparing it to absurd scenarios involving waste. The discussion links psychoanalysis to economic thought, questioning the essence of selfishness within capitalism. Insights into the moral dilemmas faced by CEOs depict the conflict between ethics and economic pressures, shedding light on wealth inequality and capitalism's failures in addressing the needs of the marginalized.
The podcast highlights capitalism's self-destructive nature, likening it to cyclical waste consumption, revealing deep psychological implications of infinite greed.
It examines how toilet designs metaphorically reflect national characteristics, illustrating the intertwining of culture, ideology, and economic systems in waste disposal practices.
Deep dives
The Role of Psychoanalytic Marxism
Psychoanalytic Marxism challenges conventional understandings of capitalism by exploring its deeper psychological implications. It compares the capitalist system to a person engaging in self-destructive behaviors, emphasizing how capitalism consumes its own resources while denying its wasteful nature. For instance, the metaphor of a snake eating its tail illustrates the perpetual cycle of capitalism, suggesting that similar to the Japanese scientist creating edible waste products, capitalism must find new ways to utilize its 'waste' to sustain itself. This exploration of consumer behavior vis-à-vis waste disposal reflects broader societal dynamics where our relationship with consumption is permeated by the capitalist drive for infinite accumulation.
Toilets and National Identities
The podcast discusses how toilet design reflects broader national characteristics, aligning with psychoanalytic insights into cultural behavior. The contrast among German, French, and British toilet designs reveals deeper societal values: the contemplative nature of German toilets, the rapid disappearance characteristic of French toilets, and the compromise seen in British toilets. These differences suggest that seemingly mundane objects can reflect complex cultural and historical factors inherent in social formations. This exploration underscores the notion that waste disposal practices are not merely practical but are also intertwined with ideological constructs shaped by economic systems.
Commodity Fetishism and the Capitalist Logic
The discussion highlights two types of commodity fetishism that stem from the dynamics of capitalism, illustrating the complex relationship between capitalists and consumers. Capitalists are driven by an infinite greed, characterized by MCM' logic, where the pursuit of profit is unending and divorced from material enjoyment. In contrast, consumers engage within the framework of CMC', pursuing tangible goods that offer immediate satisfaction. This distinction reveals that while consumer behaviors often appear selfish, they are rooted in the tangible needs and desires of individuals, contrasting sharply with the abstract and infinite nature of capitalist greed.
Selfishness in Capitalism vs. Communism
The podcast challenges the narrative that capitalism promotes selfishness while socialism and communism embody selflessness, suggesting a radical inversion of this understanding. It argues that current wealth statistics corroborate that capitalism not only fails to benefit the majority but actively exacerbates inequality, rendering communal prosperity impossible. Conversely, a socialist or communist framework could potentially provide equitable distribution of resources, thus fulfilling basic human needs. This perspective positions the notion of selfishness not just within capitalist structures but potentially favors collective ownership and responsibility as pathways to genuine human welfare.
Alright, you've been asking for it, and here it is... Adrian Johnston is back talking about his new book INFINITE GREED: THE INHUMAN SELFISHNESS OF CAPITAL.
Adrian says, “The capitalist socioeconomic system in its entirety thus resembles a person who shoves his own head up his own ass precisely in order to eat his own shit, or a snake that swallows its own tail specifically so as to consume its own feces.”
That’s right, we’re talking Marxian enjoyment as it corresponds to Lacanian pleasure, and Marxian enrichment as it corresponds to Lacanian enjoyment.
We all know by now that Marx created the symptom, but did he also create the Drive? Is selfishness essential to capitalism? Why did Marxism move away from economism? Are we technofeudal, neo-feudal, or post-capital? Where the hell are we? Find out as we go down the toilet with Adrian.