

Rethink...the meaning of terrorism
Sep 4, 2025
The podcast dives into the controversial and multifaceted definition of terrorism, scrutinizing its historical context and media application. It contrasts the UK's broader legal definition with the US approach, revealing how these differences shape public perception. Insights on intelligence decision-making highlight the complexities of policing prescribed groups and their demonstrations. The discussion also touches on the moral dilemmas surrounding state-sponsored violence, particularly drone strikes, and emphasizes the political ramifications of labeling actions as terrorism.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Labeling Carries Three Powerful Effects
- Calling someone a terrorist carries belief, moral evaluation, and legal consequences.
- The label lets listeners infer hatred of democracy, a pejorative judgment, and special legal treatment.
UK Legal Test: Action, Aim And Motive
- UK law defines terrorism by serious violence or damage plus motive to influence government or intimidate the public.
- Motives include political, religious, racial or ideological causes under current statute.
Threat-Neutral Definition Handles Diverse Groups
- The UK's threat-neutral definition handles diverse causes including domestic groups.
- That contrasts with the US focus on foreign organisations which struggles with homegrown violence.