Consumer Finance Monitor

Breaking Developments in National Bank Act Preemption

Jan 22, 2026
Join Professor Arthur Wilmarth, a distinguished scholar on banking regulation, along with John Culhane, Jr., Joseph Schuster, and Ronald Vaske, who specialize in consumer financial services. They dive into landmark court cases reshaping National Bank Act preemption, arguing over the implications of the Cantero and Conti decisions. Discussions cover the nuanced analyses required under Dodd-Frank, the growing role of state law, and the strategic adjustments banks must make to navigate these changes. Expect insights into upcoming litigation and the future of compliance in banking!
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Supreme Court Rejected Blanket Preemption

  • Cantero instructs courts to apply a case-by-case "prevents or significantly interferes" test rather than blanket preemption.
  • The Supreme Court rejected field preemption and requires a nuanced comparative analysis with prior cases.
INSIGHT

First Circuit Embraces Narrower Preemption

  • The First Circuit in Conti held Rhode Island's escrow-interest law is not preempted under Cantero's framework.
  • The court reasoned state consumer-protection laws often don't significantly interfere with national bank operations.
ADVICE

Begin Immediate Compliance Reviews

  • Start reviewing products, disclosures, and processes now to identify state laws that may apply.
  • Update compliance programs and documents proactively rather than waiting for more rulings.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app