

Ep 248: AI and Philosophy of Science
37 snips Oct 13, 2025
The discussion dives into the misconceptions around AI and knowledge creation, challenging the predictive doom narratives that dominate current discourse. It critiques the reliance on Bayesian reasoning and highlights the philosophical blind spots in understanding AI's potential. The talk emphasizes that science isn't just data extrapolation, urging a reevaluation of personhood and creativity in the context of technology. It sheds light on the pitfalls of both AI doomers and accelerationists, advocating for a more nuanced understanding of how knowledge and science evolve.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Knowledge Creation Is Unpredictable
- Knowledge creation is inherently unpredictable and cannot be reduced to data extrapolation.
- Brett Hall argues that failing to recognise literal knowledge creation leads to wrong forecasts about AI's future.
AI Doom Is A New Priestly Prophecy
- Hall frames AI debates as a clash of new priesthoods who prophesy futures people crave to hear.
- He warns prophetic, sensational claims (e.g., 'If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies') distort policy and public perception.
Early Admiration For Celebrity Physicists
- Brett Hall recalls watching Paul Davies on TV and believing physicists had special insight into big questions.
- That early admiration shaped his initial desire to study cosmology and find ultimate answers.