The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

Ep. 373: Michael Walzer on Just Wars (Part Two)

12 snips
Aug 18, 2025
Dive into the moral maze of just and unjust wars with Michael Walzer's insights. Discover when it might be acceptable to strike first or intervene in another country's affairs. The discussion navigates historical examples like the American Civil War and the Six-Day War, emphasizing the complexities of military justification. Explore the balance between state sovereignty and individual rights during humanitarian crises, and learn how historical context shapes perceptions of intervention. It's a thought-provoking examination of ethics in warfare!
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Imminence Is Too Narrow

  • 'Imminent' is too narrow for justifying preemptive war; conflicts can feel unavoidable for long periods.
  • Walzer expands the idea to a spectrum from last-minute response to broader anticipatory action.
INSIGHT

Balance-Of-Power Justifications Fail

  • Walzer rejects balance-of-power wars as illegitimate because they would justify constant conflict.
  • He argues utilitarian peace is better served by avoiding wars to preserve stability.
INSIGHT

Intent, Not Power, Matters

  • Threat must be anchored to manifest intent, not vague power shifts or ambition.
  • Walzer seeks signs that make hostile intent morally actionable, not mere speculation.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app