Power Problems
Is Whataboutism Effective?
Oct 1, 2024
Dov Levin, an Associate Professor of International Relations at the University of Hong Kong, dives into the intriguing world of whataboutism and its impact on U.S. foreign policy views. He shares insights from his survey experiments that explore how accusations of hypocrisy shape American opinions. The conversation also touches on the U.S.'s historical election interference and its connection to current debates about whataboutism. Levin emphasizes the complex interplay of naming and shaming within political discourse and considers future research avenues on this provocative topic.
39:08
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Whataboutism effectively influences American public opinion by highlighting U.S. hypocrisy, thereby reducing support for governmental critiques of other nations.
- The historical context of U.S. electoral interventions illustrates the complexity of moral authority, which other nations exploit through whataboutism to counter American criticisms.
Deep dives
Understanding Whataboutism in International Relations
Whataboutism is a rhetorical strategy used by states to counter criticism by highlighting perceived hypocrisy in their accusers. It allows nations to deflect attention from their actions by accusing their critics of similar or worse behavior. This tactic is often employed to address international criticism and appeal to both domestic and foreign audiences. Its significance lies in its ability to reshape narratives and diminish the impact of accountability on the criticized party.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
