Supreme Court likely to deny blanket immunity but could limit scope of prosecution
Apr 25, 2024
auto_awesome
Former White House Counsel Neil Eggleston and NPR correspondents discuss the Supreme Court's skepticism of Trump's blanket immunity, potential limitations on prosecution, impact on federal election interference case, and debates on official vs private acts. Justices' questions, scope of immunity, and trial timing are key topics.
Supreme Court may limit blanket immunity for presidents, balancing immunity with prosecution
Defining official acts vs private acts crucial in determining extent of presidential immunity
Deep dives
Supreme Court Oral Arguments on Presidential Immunity
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on whether a president, like Trump, is immune from criminal prosecution. Justices appeared skeptical of blanket immunity but cautious about completely disregarding it. Conservative justices emphasized protecting presidents, while liberal justices pointed out the lack of constitutional immunity for presidents.
Debate Over Official vs. Private Acts in Trump's Case
There was extensive discussion on distinguishing official acts from private ones in Trump's case. Trump's lawyer suggested most of the acts were private, implying limited immunity. The court's decision on defining official acts could significantly impact the case's outcome and potential trial before the election.
Future Implications of Supreme Court's Decision on Presidential Powers
The Supreme Court's decision could have far-reaching implications on future presidential powers. Justices debated on maintaining some level of immunity for official acts while avoiding a 'free crime zone.' The possibility of granting broader immunity or delaying the trial stirred discussions among justices, affecting public perception and legal precedents.
For this episode of Trump's Trials, NPR's Michel Martin speaks to Chief Legal Affairs Correspondent Nina Totenberg, Washington Desk Senior Editor and Correspondent Ron Elving, National Justice Correspondent Carrie Johnson and former White House Counsel Neil Eggleston.
On Thursday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over whether former President Donald Trump is immune from criminal prosecution. A majority of the justices appeared skeptical of blanket immunity. But some of the conservative justices hinted at the need for some immunity for certain actions taken while in office. The speed at which the court releases an opinion could determine whether the federal election interference case goes to trial before the November election.
Topics include: - Justices' questions - Scope of immunity - Private vs official acts - Impact on federal election interference case