Jon Stewart, the iconic comedian and former host of The Daily Show, dives into the intense media climate post-9/11, discussing how humor became a vital form of resistance against Fox News' dominant narratives. He reflects on The Daily Show's role in providing critical analysis during the Iraq War and its influence on young audiences. Stewart contrasts his show’s witty satire with Fox’s quest for power, exploring challenges faced by liberal voices in a conservative stronghold. The discourse sheds light on ethical dilemmas within news media and the struggle for integrity amid polarization.
The rise of Fox News after 9/11 fostered a jingoistic narrative while simultaneously sparking a critical counter-narrative from politically engaged comedians.
The Daily Show, under Jon Stewart, transformed political satire by merging humor with serious critique, resonating with a disillusioned audience.
The interplay between Fox News and The Daily Show showcased the power of satire in addressing media malpractice and shaping public discourse.
Deep dives
Elliot Kalin's Comedy Roots
Elliot Kalin's early fascination with both comedy and politics was shaped by his upbringing, especially through classic comedic influences like Looney Tunes and the Marx Brothers. However, he felt a disconnect with the political comedy shown on mainstream television during the 2000 election, especially sketches that trivialized the Bush-Gore debates. The breakthrough for him came with The Daily Show, which provided not only humor but also a critical perspective that resonated with his worldview. This show established a platform that articulated a perspective he identified with, transforming his perception of what political commentary could achieve.
Post-9/11 Comedy Coping Mechanisms
After the September 11 attacks, Elliot and his roommate turned to comedy as a means of coping amidst the emotional turmoil and uncertainty that surrounded them. With most late-night shows off-air during that time, they relied on older comedy, such as Mr. Bean, for a reprieve from reality. When The Daily Show returned, Jon Stewart's commentary helped them process the shocking events and the absurdity of the continued media landscape. This moment marked a significant turning point in Elliot’s appreciation for the power of satire to address serious topics and provide an emotional outlet.
The Rise of Fox News and Media Critique
Following the 9/11 attacks, Fox News emerged as a dominant media force, promoting a jingoistic narrative that many Americans embraced. However, there existed a considerable counter-narrative represented by shows like The Daily Show, which critiqued the uncritical support for war and the sensationalism propagated by Fox. The Daily Show's use of satire not only offered a different viewpoint but also engaged millions who might not typically view Fox, effectively exposing their biases without direct viewership. The juxtaposition of Fox's coverage with critical analysis from The Daily Show highlighted the distortions in media narratives during critical political moments.
Jon Stewart's Leadership and Impact
When Jon Stewart took over as host of The Daily Show, he shifted the show's approach to be more grounded in serious critique, often positioning himself as a voice of reason amidst absurdity. This strategic decision mirrored the chaotic political climate, especially during the contentious 2000 election, allowing the show to resonate with audiences disillusioned by traditional news. Stewart’s ability to balance humor with a moral imperative significantly contributed to the show's acclaim and its reputation as a credible critique of mainstream media, including Fox News. The show's satirical coverage sought not only to entertain but also to prompt critical discussions around media integrity and political accountability.
The Daily Show's Unique Role in Journalism
The Daily Show carved out a unique space in journalism by blending satire with substantive critique, effectively serving as an alternative news source for many viewers. Its innovative approach allowed the show to highlight media malpractice, particularly the coverage around significant events like the Iraq War, when traditional media largely failed to question government narratives. This form of journalism was far-reaching, as viewers who might not engage with Fox News directly were still informed about its perspectives through The Daily Show’s satire. Ultimately, this helped shape public perceptions and discussions about the media's role in society, reaffirming comedy's potential to influence political discourse.
After 9/11, the Fox News Channel rallied a huge portion of the country around the Bush administration’s vision of the world. But as the U.S. marched to war in the Middle East, journalists, liberal watchdogs, and comedians began pushing back. Could The Daily Show, Fox News’ own liberal pundits, or an employee-turned-whistleblower take Fox down a peg?
Want more from Slow Burn? Join Slate Plus to unlock full access to all seasons, including members-only bonus episodes from The Rise of Fox News. You'll also enjoy ad-free listening to all of your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe now by clicking "Try Free" at the top of the Slow Burn show page on Apple Podcasts. Or, visit slate.com/slowburnplus to get access wherever you listen.
Season 10 of Slow Burn was written and reported by Josh Levin. It was executive produced by Lizzie Jacobs.
Slow Burn is produced by Sophie Summergrad, Joel Meyer, and Rosie Belson with help from Patrick Fort, Jacob Fenston, and Julia Russo.
Derek John is Slate’s executive producer of narrative podcasts.
This season was edited by Susan Matthews and Hillary Frey.
Merritt Jacob is our senior technical director. Mix and sound design by Joe Plourde.
Our theme music was composed by Alexis Cuadrado. Derreck Johnson created the artwork for this season. Episode artwork by Ivylise Simones.