Jonathan Taplin argues yes, AI will kill the future of creative arts due to the lack of emotional depth and economic cost for human artists. The debate covers the impact of AI on copyright, compensation, and inclusion of artists, as well as skepticism towards machine-generated art. Ethical concerns and transhumanist notions are discussed. The potential devaluation of creative work and the grassroots resistance movement against AI are also examined.
Read more
AI Summary
Highlights
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
AI does not pose a threat to the future of creative arts and offers new possibilities for collaboration and innovation.
AI's impact on the economic basis for artists should be accompanied by measures to protect their rights and compensation.
Deep dives
AI's impact on creative arts
AI is not capable of making great creative work on its own and will always require human creativity. The fear that AI will kill art has been seen throughout history with the introduction of new technologies. AI can actually benefit creators by helping them work more effectively, enabling more people to participate in creative activities, and providing new tools and practices for creative work. While there are risks and disruptions associated with AI, such as devaluing certain careers, efforts are being made to mitigate these concerns through legislation, transparency, and grassroots initiatives. Overall, AI does not pose a threat to the future of creative arts, but rather offers new possibilities for collaboration and innovation.
The devaluation of creative work due to AI
One of the main concerns with AI in the creative arts is its potential to devalue creative work and impact the economic basis for artists. The automation of tasks like creating websites, writing ad copy, or mixing music could lead to the elimination of certain jobs and apprenticeship periods that are crucial for artists to develop their skills and identities. While AI can enhance some creative processes, it should be accompanied by measures to protect artists' rights, such as compensation for the use of their work and transparency in AI training. The focus should be on minimizing the negative consequences and maximizing the benefits of AI for the creative arts.
The role of AI in art and the resistance to machine culture
AI's impact on the fine art market is multifaceted. On one hand, AI's limitations prevent it from producing truly creative and genius-level art. On the other hand, AI's presence can disrupt the economics of the art market, potentially devaluing certain artistic careers. However, it is important to distinguish between the use of AI as a tool versus AI as a replacement for human creativity. Collaborative efforts between AI and humans can push the boundaries of art and lead to new forms of expression. The focus should be on challenging narratives that portray AI as a technological inevitability and advocating for fair compensation and protections for artists. While there are challenges, AI is not inherently detrimental to the future of creative arts, and artists can continue to thrive and innovate with the right approach.
The need to protect artists and promote positive AI applications
As AI continues to develop, it is crucial to protect the rights and interests of artists. Unauthorized use and scanning of artistic content should be addressed through legal frameworks and compensation mechanisms. Transparent practices and accountability from AI companies can also help ensure ethical use of AI in the creative arts. Moreover, AI should be viewed as a tool that enhances creativity rather than replacing it. AI can offer valuable tools for efficiency and experimentation, enabling more people to participate in creative activities and opening up new possibilities for artistic practices. By striking a balance between addressing potential challenges and promoting the positive applications of AI, the future of creative arts can thrive and evolve alongside technological advancements.
From AI-generated paintings to writing scripts and novels, AI is challenging our endeavor to create, innovate, and connect. Will the human touch be obsolete? Those arguing yes say since AI-created art can’t experience human emotions, it will lack depth, and it will come at an economic cost for human artists. Those arguing no say it’s another tool in a toolkit and will help express talent like never before. Now we debate: Will AI Kill the Future of the Creative Arts?
Arguing Yes: Jonathan Taplin, Author; Director Emeritus of the Annenberg Innovation Lab at the University of Southern California
Arguing No: Rebecca Fiebrink, Professor at the University of the Arts, London's Creative Computing Institute
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates