The Charlie Kirk Show Should Donald Trump Destroy the Filibuster?
Oct 31, 2025
Michael Knowles, a conservative commentator and podcaster, joins the discussion on Trump's proposal to eliminate the Senate filibuster during a government shutdown. They explore the implications of this move, weighing short-term gains against long-term risks. Knowles also sheds light on a rise in political violence, criticizing how Democrats handle the issue, and shares his experiences from a Senate hearing on the subject. Additionally, they comment on J.D. Vance's recent remarks about his wife's faith, arguing that such discussions can enrich political dialogue.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Filibuster's Long-Term Political Stakes
- Eliminating the filibuster is a high-stakes structural change that reshapes long-term politics.
- Timing matters because short-term gains can enable irreversible losses if the other party later controls power.
Short Fixes Versus Permanent Consequences
- Removing the filibuster risks permanent handicaps like new Democratic states adding senators.
- Short-term fixes (resume SNAP) don't justify sacrificing future Senate control, speakers argue.
Weigh Medium-Term Consequences First
- Think medium-term consequences before removing Senate norms like the filibuster.
- Delay radical institutional changes until you can use them for a broad, day-one agenda if you choose to act.
