

82 - Science Vs. Pseudoscience
Apr 29, 2024
Exploring the demarcation problem in science vs. pseudoscience, defining science through hypothesizing and experimenting. Blurred lines between science and humanities, importance of peer review. Contrasting philosophies on falsifiability and paradigm shifts. Validating Darwin's theory through DNA testing. Examining the scientific validity of fields like Freudian psychology and astrology.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Defining Science
- Science can be defined epistemologically (how we know things) or ontologically (what things exist).
- The epistemological view focuses on the scientific method, while the ontological view focuses on the content of science.
History vs. Science
- Shalmo Wegman recounts a conversation with a historian who claimed history isn't science because it doesn't involve experiments.
- Wegman points out that observational astronomy, which is considered science, also doesn't involve experiments.
Science and Control
- Science, according to Dan Hooper, effectively helps humans control their environment. This control is achieved through knowledge gained by scientific methods.
- Even if the primary goal is knowledge, that knowledge itself grants the ability to manipulate and control the environment.