VERITAS with Mel Hostalrich Stephen Sorensen | Fomenko's New Chronology & History's Forgeries | Part 1 of 2
Oct 8, 2021
00:00
Anatoly Fomenko is a historian who challenges the conventional chronology of historical events. He claims that many of the events recorded in history did not occur when they are believed to have happened and that the true dates have been distorted.
Fomenko asserts that ancient history, including Greece, Rome, and Egypt, is a reflection of events that took place in the Middle Ages. He also claims that Chinese and Arab history are fabrications created in the 17th and 18th centuries by Jesuits.
In his new chronology, Fomenko posits that Jesus lived in the 12th century, the Trojan War and Crusades were the same event, Genghis Khan and Mongols were Russians, the American West was once a part of a Siberian-American Empire, and more. He disputes written chronologies and scientific dating methods such as dendrochronology and radiocarbon dating.
Fomenko's claims are certainly controversial and go against widely accepted historiography. Regardless of whether or not his theories hold up under scrutiny, they are certainly thought-provoking and challenge the way we think about history and the way it has been recorded.
In conclusion, Fomenko's new chronology is a fresh perspective on history and its forgeries, which will leave you questioning the validity of the events we have come to accept as truth. Get ready to have your understanding of history challenged with Fomenko's new chronology.
Fomenko asserts that ancient history, including Greece, Rome, and Egypt, is a reflection of events that took place in the Middle Ages. He also claims that Chinese and Arab history are fabrications created in the 17th and 18th centuries by Jesuits.
In his new chronology, Fomenko posits that Jesus lived in the 12th century, the Trojan War and Crusades were the same event, Genghis Khan and Mongols were Russians, the American West was once a part of a Siberian-American Empire, and more. He disputes written chronologies and scientific dating methods such as dendrochronology and radiocarbon dating.
Fomenko's claims are certainly controversial and go against widely accepted historiography. Regardless of whether or not his theories hold up under scrutiny, they are certainly thought-provoking and challenge the way we think about history and the way it has been recorded.
In conclusion, Fomenko's new chronology is a fresh perspective on history and its forgeries, which will leave you questioning the validity of the events we have come to accept as truth. Get ready to have your understanding of history challenged with Fomenko's new chronology.