

Which Atonement Theory is Right?
Aug 2, 2022
Delve into the fascinating theories of atonement, exploring insights from historical figures like Irenaeus and Anselm. Discover how recapitulation and satisfaction theories intertwine to create a unified understanding of Christ's sacrificial role. Examine the importance of Old Testament scriptures in shaping atonement views. Unwrap the transformative journey of Christ's life and the impact of surrendering to Him, reshaping personal identity and relationships while hinting at engaging future theological discussions.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Three Primary Atonement Motifs
- Different atonement theories focus on different primary references: God, humans, or Satan.
- Gavin Ortlund highlights Aulén's threefold schema (objective, subjective, Christus Victor) as a common taxonomy.
Seek A Unifying Core
- Many atonement motifs describe results rather than the core mechanism of reconciliation.
- Ortlund proposes seeking a unifying core to hold diverse motifs together within a lowercase-c Catholic framework.
Combine Recapitulation And Satisfaction
- Ortlund suggests combining Irenaeus's recapitulation with Anselm's satisfaction as a core framework.
- He argues Christus Victor and moral influence can be affirmed without being the primary mechanism.