The Reason Roundtable Reason Versus National Review: Is Mass Immigration Good for America?
19 snips
Oct 8, 2025 
Katherine Mangu-Ward, Editor-in-chief of Reason, argues passionately for the benefits of mass immigration, citing historical contributions and economic dynamism. Opposing her, Rich Lowry from National Review raises concerns about social cohesion and fiscal implications. Alex Nowrasteh from the Cato Institute supports open immigration policies, warning against harsh enforcement. Meanwhile, Steven Camarota emphasizes the risks associated with low-skilled immigration and public service impacts. A heated debate ensues, leaving listeners to ponder the future of immigration in America.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Immigration Built Modern America
- Katherine Mangu‑Ward argues mass immigration is foundational to America's growth and identity across centuries.
- She contends waves of immigrants built infrastructure, industry, and the nation’s character.
Mass Flows Produce Political Backlash
- Rich Lowry warns the resolution endorses large, undifferentiated immigration that strains local services and provokes backlash.
- He cites recent border surges and international examples to argue for selective, sustainable immigration.
Enforcement Harms Civil Liberties
- Alex Nowrasteh links restrictive enforcement to militarized policing and rights‑erosion at the border.
- He argues freer legal migration avoids harsh enforcement and strengthens the economy and society.