AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Democrats' relationship dynamics with Speaker Mike Johnson raise questions about their expectations and perceptions of influence. Despite efforts to maintain his position, Johnson's actions have stirred controversy, highlighting the complexities of bipartisan cooperation in politics.
Recent polling data suggesting significant leads for Trump has sparked skepticism among analysts. Concerns about the reliability and accuracy of polling methods, especially in predicting election outcomes, are raising questions about the validity of current political polling.
A debate surrounding anti-Semitism legislation in Congress has ignited conversations about free speech and legal implications. Discussions on defining anti-Semitic speech and its impact on civil rights highlight the complexities of balancing free speech rights with combating hate speech.
Speculations about Michelle Obama's potential presidential run are debunked, emphasizing her disinterest in political leadership. Reflecting on her past experiences and public statements, it becomes clear that such aspirations are unfounded and contrary to her personal preferences.
The complexity of interpreting past lies in determining the credibility of witnesses, such as Michael Cohen, challenges traditional notions of reliability. Recent media reflections on Cohen's credibility highlight the intricate dynamics involved in assessing the trustworthiness of testimonies.
The spillover effects of protests extending into Harlem, causing disruptions and heightened police presence, exemplify the unintended consequences of socio-political movements. Unforeseen impacts on local communities and institutions shed light on the complexities of protest strategies.
The evolving landscape of protest tactics on college campuses underscores the need for assessing the broader implications of speech boundaries. Controversies surrounding the redefinition of inflammatory terms and their impact on campus discourse reveal the nuanced challenges of free speech advocacy.
Reflecting on strategic approaches towards conflict resolution in conflicts like Ukraine and Gaza reveals diverging views on quick decisive actions versus prolonged engagements. Evaluating the potential outcomes of swift, full-force interventions versus gradual escalations underscores the complexities of conflict management.
Amid ongoing global conflicts, debates on strategic intervention methods and timing raise critical questions about the effectiveness of different conflict resolution models. Reconsidering the implications of rapid, extensive military actions versus incremental strategies highlights the multidimensional nature of international disputes.
Contemplations on decision-making paradigms within conflict scenarios offer insights into the complexities of strategic planning and intervention methodologies. Revisiting past conflicts and theorizing alternative approaches underscore the intricate dynamics of conflict resolution and the implications of varied strategic initiatives.
Ari is on the road coaching the University of Vermont’s frisbee team in college nationals (Go Ari!). So this week, Isaac is going to do some mini coverage on ten topics that have been on his mind. Buckle up.
You can watch our latest video, Isaac's interview with former Congressman Ken Buck (CO-04) here.
Check the next episode of our new podcast series, The Undecideds. In episode 3, our focus shifts from Donald Trump toward President Joe Biden. Much has been made in the media about his age and memory and whether he’s cognitively capable of handling another term. But an unanticipated performance at the State of the Union reignited his base and left many questioning that narrative. And while Donald Trump faces a jury of his peers in court, the court of public opinion continues to weigh in on the effectiveness of Biden’s foreign policies, with an eye to the conflicts between Israel and Palestine, Ukraine and Russia, and our own protracted clash at our southern border. Our undecided voters share their observations on the current commander in chief and how his decisions on the world stage affect their decision in the voting booth. You can listen to Episode 3 here.
Today’s clickables: Intro (0:28), #1 - Mike Johnson and Democrats (2:06), #2 - The Polls (5:11), #3 - Anti-Semitism bill w/Amanda Berman (8:26), #4 - Michelle Obama doesn’t want to be President. Ever. (27:48), #5 Michael Cohen is not a credible witness (30:14) #6 - Penn protests (32:16), #7 - Enabling (38:08), #8 - You can’t redefine words (39:53), #9 - Unintended consequences of protesting (42:04), #10 - We should have gotten involved sooner (43:48)
You can subscribe to Tangle by clicking here or drop something in our tip jar by clicking here.
Our podcast is written by Isaac Saul and edited and engineered by Jon Lall. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet 75.
Our newsletter is edited by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman, Will Kaback, Bailey Saul, Sean Brady, and produced in conjunction with Tangle’s social media manager Magdalena Bokowa, who also created our logo.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/tanglenews/messageHosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode