'If You Can Keep It': The Future Of The Federal Judiciary
Dec 16, 2024
auto_awesome
Mary McCord, a former Assistant Attorney General, discusses the recent push to create 63 new federal judgeships and its potential impact on the judiciary. Jeff Rosen, constitutional law expert, highlights the contrasting judicial legacies of Presidents Trump and Biden, emphasizing diversity on the bench. Journalist Josh Gerstein sheds light on the intricacies of judicial appointments and the influence of the Federalist Society, warning of rising partisanship. Together, they explore the lasting implications of these developments on the justice system.
The recent bill proposing 63 new judgeships highlights the urgent need to address federal court backlogs and delays resulting from rising litigation demands.
The ideological shift in the federal judiciary depends heavily on presidential appointments, with each administration impacting diversity and long-term judicial perspectives significantly.
Deep dives
The Need for More Federal Judges
The recent passage of a bill to create 63 new permanent judgeships highlights the growing concern over case backlogs and delays within the federal judiciary. Lawmakers from both parties have indicated the urgent need for more federal judges to handle rising litigation and serve justice effectively. If enacted, the bill would give the next president, potentially President-elect Trump, the opportunity to appoint 22 judges while also addressing the critical shortage as demands on the court continue to escalate. The political tension surrounding this issue has escalated, particularly with President Biden signaling a veto despite initial bipartisan support for the Judges Act.
Impact of Presidential Appointments on the Judiciary
The discussion around federal judicial appointments reveals a significant shift in the ideological landscape of the courts depending on which party holds the presidency. President Trump appointed a notable number of conservative judges, prioritizing candidates from the Federalist Society, while President Biden has focused on increasing diversity by appointing more judges of color and women. Both administrations have resulted in a marked generational shift in the judiciary, affecting how various issues—such as civil rights and environmental policy—are adjudicated. Patterns in past judicial appointments indicate a trend where presidential selections can lead to significant and lasting changes within the judicial system.
Judicial Confirmation Process and Partisan Politics
The confirmation process for federal judges has become increasingly politicized, leading to narrow partisan splits in recent years. Historically, nominees were confirmed with overwhelming support, but today’s environment sees votes often falling along party lines. Nominees now face extensive scrutiny from both the executive branch and their home state senators, which can lead to delays and political maneuvering. This partisanship can obstruct the timely filling of vacancies, exacerbating the already pressing need for more judges amid escalating case loads across the courts.
Delays in the Federal Court System
Delays within the federal court system are significant and tied to the insufficient number of judges relative to the growing population and litigation demands. Many judicial vacancies remain unfilled due to objections from state senators, particularly in states with Republican representation, which complicates the process of filling these roles. Delays can severely impact individuals' rights, particularly in cases involving employment discrimination or civil rights, where prolonged litigation can burden those affected. As frustrations with the judicial backlog grow, discussions about filling these roles and reforming the system are becoming increasingly urgent.
Last week, the House passed a bill to create 63 new permanent judgeships. Case backlogs and delays have had many lawmakers saying we need more federal judges. If the bill did become law, President-elect Donald Trump would have 22 new seats to fill. The legislation originally had bipartisan support, but President Joe Biden vowed to veto it, with the support of many Democrats.
In his first term, Trump put more judges in place than almost any president in history. Biden has made his mark too, surpassing that number. As of last week, he had also put more judges of color on the bench than any of his predecessors.
Federal judges almost always serve life terms, meaning each of these picks can have lasting consequences for Americans.
We look back and look ahead at our federal judiciary.