Joined by Erin Hawley, a senior counsel at the Alliance Defending Freedom with a rich background in appellate law and the DOJ, the conversation dives into the control of executive agencies. Topics include the constitutional implications of tariffs, the complexities of presidential power during emergencies, and the often turbulent relationship between Congress and executive authority. Hawley also shares insights on the accountability of independent agencies and the pathway to Supreme Court cases, adding a dash of humor along the way.
The delegation of tariff authority to the President raises constitutional questions about the transfer of Congress's core powers.
The 2013 D.C. Circuit ruling emphasizes that the President lacks unilateral authority to withhold appropriated funds from Congress.
The tension between the unitary executive theory and the independence of agencies complicates the balance of power in governance.
Deep dives
The Significance of Tariffs
The Constitution assigns tariff power to Congress, as outlined in Article 1, Section 8, yet recent practices have blurred this line. Delegation of tariff authority to the President raises constitutional questions about whether Congress can transfer its core powers. The International Emergency Economic Powers Act allows the President wide discretion in times of national emergency, leading to debates about what constitutes such a state. As historical context reveals, this delegation might undermine the very checks and balances intended to limit executive power.
Funding Freeze Controversies
The President does not have unilateral authority to withhold appropriated funds from Congress, as established in a 2013 D.C. Circuit ruling. The ruling indicates that a President must propose rescissions for Congress to approve, emphasizing the separation of powers. This principle becomes particularly complicated when discussing agencies like USAID, which was created by executive order rather than statute. The conflicting powers of the presidency and Congress over spending underscore the complexities surrounding fiscal governance.
Independent Agencies and Executive Control
The structural independence of certain agencies, such as the Federal Trade Commission, raises questions about accountability and executive control. These agencies operate separately from the direct control of the President, which may conflict with the principles of political accountability. The Supreme Court has grappled with the nature of independent agencies, with decisions stressing that some agencies exercise executive power. The ongoing debate centers around how much control the President should have over these agencies while maintaining their effectiveness.
Legal Accountability in the Executive Branch
The intricate balance of power requires that executive actions can be challenged in court as a means of checking authority. When a federal official defies a lawful court order, mechanisms such as mandamus can enforce judicial rulings and maintain legal standards. There is concern about potential governmental overreach or defiance, but mechanisms exist to uphold the law. However, a complete breakdown of the legal order would necessitate broader systemic failures beyond any single case.
The Contours of the Unitary Executive Theory
The concept of the unitary executive posits that the President holds ultimate authority over the executive branch, which includes the power to remove officials. This notion has practical implications for the extent of presidential control over administrative agencies. Nevertheless, historical and contemporary case law reveals complex layers where checks and balances operate within the framework of the government. The tension between efficient governance and adherence to constitutional principles continues to provoke debate in legal and political arenas.
Sarah Isgur and David French are joined by Erin Hawley, senior counsel to the appellate team at the Alliance Defending Freedom, to discuss the latest, er, kerfuffle that sent federal employees scrambling. Who is in control of executive agencies?
Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch’s offerings—including Sarah’s Collision newsletter, weekly livestreams, and other members-only content—click here.