
Today, Explained
The Harvey Weinstein apologist
May 5, 2025
E.J. Dickson, a writer for New York magazine's The Cut, and Constance Grady, a senior culture writer at Vox, tackle the polarizing views surrounding Harvey Weinstein's retrial and Candace Owens's defense of him. They discuss Owens's controversial rise from a bullied teen to a provocative commentator. The duo explores the media's portrayal of Weinstein within the Me Too movement and critiques the legal proceedings' handling. Their conversation highlights the complex dynamics of public perception and the cultural backlash against women’s rights advancements.
27:53
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The recent legal developments in Harvey Weinstein's case raise questions about the fairness of trials influenced by social movements like Me Too.
- Candace Owens' controversial support for Weinstein reflects a growing backlash against traditional feminist narratives among younger women seeking alternative viewpoints.
Deep dives
Harvey Weinstein's Retrial and the Legal Landscape
Harvey Weinstein's legal case has seen a significant turn as an appeals court has overturned his 2020 conviction, citing a lack of a fair trial. This development necessitates that his accusers testify again, as the court deemed previous testimony that was presented as evidence to be inadmissible. The focus has shifted to the credibility of allegations as Weinstein's defenders argue that the number of accused women does not necessarily correlate with guilt, labeling his conviction as a result of societal pressures from the Me Too movement. This situation highlights a complex dialogue around justice, accountability, and the influence of public sentiment on legal proceedings.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.