Analyzing the Hockey Canada trial [5]

[Part 5 of 5] This final instalment wraps up our coverage and analysis of the Hockey Canada scandal and trial. At the end, Kristi shares her personal opinion about what likely happened in Room 209 that night — and why the verdicts would have remained the same anyway. The difference is in how the judge got there. 

Please note: this series does not dispute the judge’s not guilty verdicts.

Our position is that the framing of the evidence in the written decision was unnecessary and damaging, with impact that extends far beyond the trial.

Do you have a “fawning” story you’d like to share?

Write it or record it and contact us through the website,  Facebook or Instagram. Confidentially assured.

Beyond The Verdict: www.beyondtheverdict.ca

More information and resources:

• Young men need to be taught what consent looks like by Elizabeth Renzetti, Toronto Star
• Hockey Canada trial outcome a 'crushing day' for sexual assault survivors featuring Daphne Gilbert, by Sheena Goodyear, CBC Radio 
• Megan Savard for the Defence by Kathrine Laidlaw, Toronto life
• Hockey Canada trial should put spotlight on morality of society by Catherine Ford
• LISTEN: The Trial of Jacob Hoggard (JB’s story) and Kelly Favro’s Story
• If you or anyone you know is experiencing sexual violence and abuse, help is available at REES Community or Ending Violence Canada - Sexual Assault Centres, Crisis Lines and Support Services

Full list of resources, information sources, and more: www.canadiantruecrime.ca/episode

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.