Jesse Wegman, a member of the Times editorial board, champions election reform and advocates for using the popular vote to elect the president. He discusses how the Electoral College can enable legal manipulation and complicate the integrity of elections. Wegman also examines the implications of the 'Stop the Steal' movement and new amendments designed to modernize outdated electoral laws. His insights reflect both the challenges and the optimism for the future of American democracy, especially in light of recent political events.
The Electoral College system distorts democracy by focusing on swing states, leading to potential manipulation and unequal campaign attention.
Recent reforms like the Electoral Count Reform Act aim to stabilize the electoral process and reflect public demand for a popular vote.
Deep dives
The Impact of the Electoral College on Democracy
The Electoral College system significantly distorts the democratic process by prioritizing a few swing states over the national popular vote. This winner-take-all approach allows a small number of votes to determine the outcome of presidential elections, leading to unequal attention from campaigns and potential manipulation of results. The challenges posed by this system were evident in the close results of the 2020 and 2016 elections, where a mere handful of votes could alter the final outcome despite millions voting differently nationwide. Such scenarios create an environment of litigation and dispute rather than fostering an acceptance of electoral outcomes, undermining the principles of representative democracy.
Reforms and Responses to Electoral Challenges
In response to the chaotic events surrounding the 2020 election, new reforms such as the Electoral Count Reform Act have been put in place to stabilize the electoral process. This act raises the threshold required to challenge electoral votes in Congress, making it more difficult for fringe actors to disrupt the results. Furthermore, the public backlash against the January 6th insurrection has heightened awareness of the vulnerabilities in the electoral system, prompting efforts to protect against anti-democratic influences. The growing desire among Americans for a popular vote reflects a significant shift, indicating that lasting reform may be necessary to restore faith in the electoral process.
Jesse Wegman, a member of the Times editorial board, hasargued that to make the American election process more straightforward and just, the United States should elect its president based on the outcome of the popular vote rather than the Electoral College. But in this episode of “The Opinions” he goes a step further, arguing that the Electoral College renders elections more vulnerable to legal manipulation for political ends.
Thoughts? Email us at theopinions@nytimes.com
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode