The Political Scene | The New Yorker
The Case for Using the Twenty-fifth Amendment on Biden
Jul 10, 2024
Harvard Law professor Jeannie Suk Gersen discusses invoking the 25th Amendment on Biden for cognitive impairment. Topics include Biden's cognitive decline, implications of his resignation for Kamala Harris, and public responses to the idea.
37:16
Episode guests
AI Summary
Highlights
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The 25th Amendment could be used to remove an unfit President due to cognitive impairment concerns.
- The invocation of the 25th Amendment against Biden could have significant political and electoral consequences.
Deep dives
The Debate Raises Concerns About Biden's Cognitive Health and Ability to Serve
President Biden's lackluster performance at the 2024 presidential debate sparked doubts about his vigor and cognitive health. This led to questions regarding his suitability to continue running for office and complete his term in light of potential cognitive impairment issues. Jeannie Sue Gerson's New Yorker article suggests Democrats consider employing the 25th Amendment against Biden, emphasizing the relevance of the amendment for situations involving a president's alleged inability to function effectively.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
