Mark Joseph Stern, a legal expert and senior writer at Slate, sheds light on the erosion of judicial patience with Trump’s legal claims. He discusses the complexities surrounding the Alien Enemies Act and the potential for Supreme Court intervention. Meanwhile, Wendy Weiser, a voting rights specialist at the Brennan Center, critiques Trump's executive order on election integrity, which could disenfranchise millions. Together, they explore the risks of new voting regulations and the urgent need to protect democratic processes.
The Trump administration's executive order on election integrity is criticized for attempting to disenfranchise millions of eligible voters through restrictive measures.
Judges are displaying skepticism towards the Trump administration's legal justifications, indicating a significant challenge to the government's exercise of executive power.
The podcast emphasizes the urgent need for activism and public engagement to protect voting rights in the face of rising authoritarianism.
Deep dives
Travel Smart with Smart Travel Podcast
The podcast discusses how to make informed decisions while traveling, emphasizing the significance of understanding various travel options. It highlights the benefits of utilizing different booking platforms that can lead to financial savings on trips. Additionally, it explores strategies for maximizing travel points to experience luxury, such as flying first class without overspending. The podcast serves as a guide for travelers who aspire to enhance their travel experiences by being financially savvy.
Judicial Controversies and the Trump Administration
The episode covers the ongoing tensions between the Trump administration and federal courts, spotlighting the administration’s confrontations with judges regarding immigration policies. Significant attention is given to a court ruling preventing the deportation of Venezuelan individuals under questionable legal grounds, suggesting that the administration's approach is likely unconstitutional. The discussions reveal a troubling pattern of derogatory language used by officials towards the judiciary, which raises concerns about the integrity of legal proceedings. This highlights the precarious state of law within a system grappling with political upheaval.
Eroding Voting Rights through Executive Action
The episode delves into a new executive order that aims to alter voting rights in the U.S., proposing strict measures like requiring passports for voter registration. This move is seen as a direct threat to democracy, potentially disenfranchising millions of eligible voters. The implications of this order are alarming, particularly for marginalized groups who may lack the required documentation. Furthermore, the conversation underscores the broader context of legislative efforts that are pushing similar constraints on voting access across various states.
Legal System Challenges and the Alien Enemies Act
The podcast examines a recent legal challenge involving the Alien Enemies Act, with judges expressing skepticism towards the government's justification for detaining Venezuelans without due process. The discussion reveals how courts are scrutinizing the administration's actions, suggesting that the legal arguments are weak and unsupported by evidence. This highlights a critical juncture in U.S. law where executive power is being contested in court, reflecting the ongoing struggle for civil liberties. The situation presents a significant test for the balance of power within the judicial system.
The Road Ahead for Voting Rights
The episode concludes with reflections on the growing urgency of protecting voting rights amid rising authoritarian tendencies. Advocates emphasize the critical importance of countering oppressive measures that undermine election integrity and access. The conversation also identifies the necessity for increased activism and public engagement to defend democratic processes. Overall, the podcast calls for a proactive stance in preserving the right to vote, recognizing that voting serves as a fundamental pillar for protecting all other civil liberties.
The Trumpian inversion of reality was threaded into so many areas of the law and active litigation this week.
Slate senior writer Mark Joseph Stern joins Dahlia Lithwick to discuss the apparent evaporation of judicial patience for Trump lawyers simultaneously claiming that a signal chat was not classified or subject to record preservation rules, AND the flights to El Salvador that were filmed for posterity on arrival at a prison were in fact state secrets. Together, they also think through the likelihood of the Supreme Court stepping into the Alien Enemies Act case at this early stage by just taking the Trump administration at its word that those summary renditions were totally legal and constitutionally correct.
Next, Dahlia Lithwick talks to Wendy Weiser, vice president for democracy at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law School, about another Trumpian inversion of reality: his executive order titled “Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections”, which in fact is not about election integrity, but instead an extension of the Big Lie election theory that could disenfranchise millions of eligible voters.
Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Amicus show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen.
