7am How Albanese killed the climate wars
Oct 8, 2025
In this discussion, journalist Nick Feik critiques Anthony Albanese's climate pledge and the government's inadequate emissions targets. He highlights how the proposed range of 62–70% for reductions falls short and lacks strong legislative support. Feik also delves into the media's role in framing climate issues, suggesting it has turned serious policy debates into political theater. He warns that this could lead to a dangerous disconnect between political narratives and public trust as climate impacts escalate.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Global Pitch Versus Domestic Reality
- Anthony Albanese pitched Australia's climate target as ambitious and achievable on the world stage.
- Media treated the number as evidence of a sensible middle path, masking policy shortcomings.
Targets Omit Most Australian Emissions
- The government's 62–70% domestic emissions range won't meet international scientific standards and ignores exports.
- Exports account for roughly 80% of emissions for which Australia is responsible, so the target omits the majority.
Targets Without Teeth
- Labor set an emissions target but passed no comprehensive, legally binding policies to force domestic cuts.
- The upgraded safeguard mechanism still lets big polluters buy unlimited dubious offsets instead of cutting real emissions.