Frontline special - the ground war in Ukraine during 2024
Dec 28, 2024
auto_awesome
Philip Ingram, a former Colonel and NATO military intelligence officer, provides deep insights into the transformative ground war in Ukraine. He discusses how military aid delays have shaped Ukraine's counteroffensive and the severe costs of the conflict. Ingram examines Ukraine's evolving tactics under General Siersky and the shifting dynamics of Russian defenses. The conversation also dives into the geopolitical implications of the war, particularly in a potential Trump presidency and its effects on NATO relations.
The tactical stalemate in Ukraine's ground war is influenced by delayed military aid from the U.S., affecting Ukraine's counteroffensive capabilities.
Shifts in Ukrainian military leadership and strategies highlight the need for coordinated operations to effectively challenge Russia's evolving tactics and resources.
Deep dives
Stalemate and Tactical Shifts in Ukraine War
The ground war in Ukraine has reached a tactical stalemate, characterized by a constant shift of initiative between Ukrainian and Russian forces. The conflict has expanded into Crimea and Russia, demonstrating evolving operational strategies beyond mere frontline accomplishments. The delay of a significant $60 billion military aid package from the U.S. severely limited Ukraine's capability to execute their counteroffensive effectively, leaving them lacking in essential ammunition and artillery. This imbalance allowed Russia to regain momentum and employ new tactics that contribute to increased casualties on both sides, but more significantly, bolster the Russian war effort.
Challenges and Adaptations in Ukrainian Tactics
The shift in command within the Ukrainian military leadership led to a reassessment of tactics, albeit not immediately effective. As General Siersky took over, he strategically evaluated the situation before launching a focused operation into Russian territory, including the incursion into Kursk. However, the lack of resources, particularly armored engineering capabilities and air support, has hindered Ukraine's ability to capitalize on these tactical changes. The ongoing conflict underscores the necessity for the Ukrainians to develop coordinated operations while effectively utilizing their limited resources amidst a massive and formidable Russian defense.
Geopolitical Dynamics and Future Prospects
The geopolitical landscape surrounding the Ukraine conflict remains complex, with potential implications hinging on future diplomatic engagements, especially with upcoming political changes in the U.S. Trump's possible return to office may heighten pressure on both Ukraine and Russia, shaping strategies in the ongoing war. Ukraine's desire for a cooperative approach with the U.S. could lead to fresh military support, while concerns about Russia's sustainability and the impact of increasing casualties loom large. As 2025 approaches, there is a belief that sustainable military initiatives may emerge from both sides, dictating the course of the conflict and international responses.
In this extended Frontline conversation, James Hanson speaks to military analyst and former military intelligence officer and NATO planner Philip Ingram MBE about the ground war in Ukraine during 2024.
The World in 10 is the Times' daily podcast dedicated to global security. Expert analysis of war, diplomatic relations and cyber security from The Times' foreign correspondents and military specialists.