How the SBTi is helping businesses navigate the journey to net zero
Oct 27, 2023
auto_awesome
Alberto Carrillo Pineda, cofounder and CTO of the SBTi, along with Rob Bradley and Miranda Nayyar from EY, discuss the importance of setting science-based emission reduction targets. They highlight the challenges companies face in data collection and achieving set targets, as well as the progress and ambition of companies in setting and implementing these targets. They also touch on improving data collection practices, transparency, and the challenges of establishing standards and norms in the sustainability space.
The Science-Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) sets global standards for science-based climate targets, promoting accountability and transparency.
Companies face challenges in setting science-based targets, including collecting accurate data on emissions and focusing efforts on reducing impact.
Deep dives
The Importance of Science-Based Target Initiative (SBTI) in Climate Change Mitigation
The Science-Based Target Initiative (SBTI) supports companies in setting standardized science-based emission reduction targets to combat climate change. It is a partnership between various organizations, including the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) and the United Nations Global Compact. The SBTI aligns its targets with the Paris Climate Agreement, aiming to limit global warming to below two degrees Celsius. Over 4,000 companies, covering a third of global market capitalization, have already set science-based targets through SBTI, representing a diverse range of industries and geographic locations. The SBTI plays a crucial role in creating accountability, transparency, and trust in corporate climate action.
Challenges Faced by Companies in Setting Science-Based Targets
Companies often face challenges in setting science-based targets, such as collecting accurate data on value chain emissions and understanding where to focus their efforts to reduce their impact. The SBTI provides guidance and standards to help companies overcome these challenges and develop effective climate transition plans. As companies move towards meeting their targets, they must improve data collection practices and be transparent about both the strengths and limitations of the data used. The expectations for companies to demonstrate leadership in climate action are evolving, and a focus on eliminating emissions from the value chain is becoming increasingly important.
Role of SBTI in Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) and the Importance of Accountability
The SBTI is actively involved in developing measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) frameworks to ensure companies accurately track and report progress towards their science-based targets. By standardizing the MRV process, SBTI helps create transparency, traceability, and credibility in corporate climate actions. As companies work towards net zero targets, they need to align with emerging standards, such as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive in the European Union and SEC regulations. The SBTI aims to collaborate with other standards organizations to ensure interoperability and harmonization in the evolving ecosystem. The use of voluntary carbon market credits is also being considered, and SBTI will assess the effectiveness of different market instruments for supporting corporate claims.
As businesses prepare to meet the growing demand for transparency in emissions reporting, the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) is leading the way in setting global standards for climate target setting. In a recent episode of the EY Sustainability Matters podcast, host Bruno Sarda is joined by Alberto Carrillo Pineda, cofounder and CTO of the SBTi, and the two members of the EY Climate Change and Sustainability Services, Rob Bradley, Managing Director, Ernst & Young LLP, and Miranda Nayyar, Manager, Ernst & Young LLP.
Setting, reporting and delivering on credible climate targets is becoming increasingly important as mandatory climate regulations come into effect. EY teams and the SBTi are collaborating in this area to support clients in committing to and setting science-based targets, and in developing decarbonization pathways to meet these goals. The EY organization and the SBTi recently co-authored research on the landscape of corporate measurement, reporting and verification related to science-based target setting, which is available to read (SBTi-EY-Landscape-Analysis-of-Measurement-and-Reporting-of-Science-Based-Targets.pdf (sciencebasedtargets.org)).
Pineda emphasizes that the SBTi’s focus is on setting the global standard for science-based climate targets to promote accountability and transparency. The speakers address the challenges companies face in climate target setting, particularly in gathering robust data and achieving set targets.
The discussion also explores the impact of emerging climate disclosures, such as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the U.S. Securities and Exchange commission (SEC), and how companies can prepare for these.
Looking to the future, Pineda is optimistic about the actual implementation, and notes that the SBTi standards will continue to evolve.
Key takeaways include:
The importance of setting climate targets has increased, and with more companies making public disclosures, issues of standardization have arisen.
The SBTi is evolving standards to provide a globally standardized way to set climate targets and assess decarbonization progress.
Setting of targets should go hand in hand with a robust decarbonization strategy to deliver on commitments.
Key challenges are data collection and access to data across the value chain.
The SBTi is moving toward a formal standard-setting structure and remains dedicated to continuously evolving and revising their standards to ensure alignment with the most up-to-date scientific research and evidence.