Bruce Perrens envisions a post open source era that involves establishing a yearly compliance process for companies to gain the rights to use post open software.
The hosts strongly advocate against paying ransoms in ransomware attacks, urging organizations to focus on rebuilding their systems, reporting incidents to law enforcement, and implementing backup and disaster recovery measures.
Deep dives
Bruce Perrens' vision for post open source
Bruce Perrens envisions a post open source era that goes beyond traditional licensing and focuses on corporate relationships with developers. His plan involves establishing a yearly compliance process for companies to gain the rights to use post open software. Perrens suggests transitioning from licensing code to having contracts, although this distinction is seen as dubious since licenses are essentially contracts. While Perrens acknowledges the need for better concepts in licensing and improving code distribution, critics argue that his ideas do not offer a clear justification for a separate post open source movement.
The debate on paying ransomware
The podcast explores the issue of whether organizations should pay ransomware to regain access to their encrypted systems. While the article presented a controversial conclusion that paying the ransom is preferable, the hosts strongly disagree. They argue against paying ransoms, stating that it funds further criminal operations and sends the wrong message to attackers. They assert that organizations should be honest with clients about the situation, rebuild their systems, report the incident to law enforcement, and prioritize proper backup and disaster recovery measures to prevent future attacks.
Challenges in enforcing anti-ransomware laws
The hosts discuss the challenges of enforcing laws against paying ransomware. They argue that it should be illegal for private entities to pay ransoms as it supports criminal activities. However, they acknowledge the difficulties in enforcing such laws, especially for large organizations that might struggle to keep ransomware attacks under wraps due to legal obligations and scrutiny. They emphasize the importance of reporting incidents, learning from the experience, and investing in competent IT help and security measures.
The limitations of licensing in ensuring software integrity
The podcast explores the limitations of software licensing in protecting against cyber threats. While some argue that more restrictive licenses could minimize loopholes, the hosts contend that this approach leads to more sophisticated exploitation techniques. They emphasize the need for constant adaptation and evolution in security measures, drawing a parallel to the ever-changing nature of software development. Additionally, they caution against relying solely on licenses to address legal and societal issues, stressing the importance of fair business practices and responsible corporate behavior.
Why the problems with open source licenses aren’t quite as easy to fix as some people think, the reasons you should never pay ransomware gangs, and running a Nagios distro on a Raspberry Pi.
Check out the brand new Autonomous IT podcast. Listen in as a variety of experts in the IT Operations space discuss the latest Patch Tuesday releases, mitigation tips, and custom automations to help with CVE remediations. Listen now on Spotify, Apple, or wherever you get your podcasts.